Laserfiche WebLink
' r#0t0 gteal rtelratd 1= Page 12 <br /> Dual Phase Extraction Pilot Test Report <br /> Project No 723 2 <br /> November 12,2004 <br />' of 35% H202 mixed with 60 gallons of distilled water for a total of 75 gallons This <br /> represents 19% of the calculated pore volume <br /> ' * Cylinder pore vol = height x area x porosity = 20 feet x rr(4 feet)2 x 0 5= 503ft, <br /> 503Y x 7 48 gallons/ftj=3752 gallons <br /> ' The TPH-G concentrations in MW-9 have rebounded since the pilot test was completed On <br /> August 25, 2004 well MW-9 was sampled as part of a routine quarterly monitoring event and <br /> ' found to contain 122,000 ug/l TPH-G This suggests that the amount of water in the pore <br /> spaces around MW-9 treated was miniscule in relation to the total volume monitored by the <br /> GeoprobeTM observation wells <br /> Another consideration in the test was the organic content of the soils The pre-test soil <br /> composite samples A & B contained 1900 and 4300 mg/kg total organic carbon (TOC), <br /> ' respectively (see Table 1) The TOC concentration added to the TPH-G (6000 mg/kg at 20 ft <br /> in GP-2) increases the amount of total organic load that will be oxidized by these chemicals <br /> This will result in a slower decline in the groundwater contaminant concentrations since the <br /> ' TOC will run competition with TPH-G <br /> M7.0 CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> Based on our interpretation of the data collected over the course of this subsurface <br /> ' investigation, GTI have reached several conclusions These conclusions are based on the <br /> premise that the data we considered, although incomplete, are representative of actual site <br /> conditions We acknowledge that there may be undiscovered conditions, which would upon <br /> ' their consideration, change our interpretation and thus our conclusions Our <br /> recommendations are based on our knowledge of site conditions, and on the state and <br /> limitations of subsurface investigative technology <br /> The following conclusions are made <br /> ' 1 ISCO is a viable technology for reducing contaminant concentrations in groundwater at <br /> the site <br /> ' 2 The clayey nature of the site's soils inhibits oxidant transport and thereby reduces the <br /> efficiency of ISCO or for that matter, any in situ technology A permeability enhancing <br /> technology may need to be applied at this site to compensate for this site limiting <br /> ' condition <br /> 3 Oxidation-reduction potential (ORP) measurements confirm the chemical alteration of the <br /> aquifer and thus serve as an indicator for monitoring ISCO effectiveness <br /> 4 The five-foot sampling interval utilized in bore hole investigation at the site leaves data <br /> gaps for the possible existence of thin (<1 foot thick) sand/silt layers that could act asv� <br />