Laserfiche WebLink
Feb 05 03 02:29p El -'nn Hathaway <br />,WRCB, MAY 2002 <br />Test Method Developed by: ❑ Sump Manufacturer ❑ Industry Standard <br />Other (S6Ser-*) <br />Test Method ` - ❑ Pressure <br />❑ Other (S, <br />Test Equipment Used: VM1 <br />Sump 9- <br />(530) 755-1950 p.4 <br />Page 3 of .5 <br />[] Professional Engineer <br />❑ Vacuum ❑ Hydrostatic <br />Equipment Resolution: AS gpb <br />Sump # Samp # Sump # <br />Sump Diameter <br />�7 <br />Sump Depth <br />Sump Material: <br />Height from Tank Top to Top of <br />Highest Piping Penetration: <br />Height from Tank Top to Lowest <br />Electrical -Penetration: <br />Condition of SUMP prior to testing - <br />Portion of Sump Tested: <br />/df <br />Does turbine shut down when sump <br />Sensor n'ete either product or water? <br />Turbine shutdown response time: <br />is system programmed for <br />fail-safe shutdown? <br />Was fail-safe verified to be <br />operational? <br />Wait time between applying pressure/ <br />vacuo uNkniter & starting test: <br />Test Start Time: <br />initial Reading (R,) <br />'fest End Time: <br />Final Reading (RF): <br />Test Duration: <br />Change in Reading (RF - Rx): <br />Pass I Fail Threshold or Criteria: <br />C3 PASS ❑ FA1L <br />❑ PASS ❑FAIL <br />❑PASS ❑ FAIL❑PASS <br />FAIL <br />TEST RESU%T: <br />❑ Yes❑No❑NA <br />❑Yes❑No❑NA <br />❑Yes❑No❑NA <br />❑Yes❑No❑NA <br />Was sensor removed for testing. <br />Was sensor properly replaced 8c <br />❑Yes No NA <br />❑ ❑ <br />Yes No NA <br />® Q ❑ <br />❑Yes ❑ No ❑ NA <br />❑Yes ❑ No ❑ NA <br />verified functional a8er testing? <br />Comments — (include informs <br />tion on repairs made prior to t,- t &, and recomozended follow-up for failed tests) <br />