Laserfiche WebLink
In each well, a filter pack of#2112 graded and washed silica sand was placed through the hollow <br /> stem augers as they were slowly retrieved and until the sand pack reached approximately two feet <br /> above the top of the screened interval Following the placement of the sand packs, the driller <br /> developed each of the wells by the surge and purge method Each of the wells was surged for <br /> approximately 5 minutes using a wire-line surge block system Between surging cycles, <br /> approximately 5 gallons of groundwater were bailed from each well Following well development, <br /> two feet of hydrated bentonite chips were placed within the annular space between the borehole <br /> and the well casing A surface seal of neat cement grout was placed over the hydrated bentonite, <br /> under PHSIEHD observation The tops of the wells were secured with water-tight locking caps <br /> and 8-inch diameter, traffic-rated utility boxes <br /> During October 2000, Morrow Surveying (California Licensed Land Surveyor#5161) surveyed <br /> each of the newly-installed wellheads Morrow Surveying located each of the wells and measured <br /> the elevations of the tops of each well casing to the nearest 0 01 foot, referenced to an assumed <br /> elevation of 100 00 feet above mean sea level (msl) A benchmark was not available in the site <br /> vicinity The surveyor's report is included as Appendix B <br /> 2 2 2 Soil Sampling and Analysis <br /> During drilling,, soil samples were collected at five-foot intervals using a modified California split- <br /> spoon sampler lined with 2-inch diameter by 6-inch long brass or stainless steel sleeves A field <br /> geologist logged each of the soil samples for geologic and hydrogeologEc characteristics and <br /> screened each sample with an organic vapor monitor, equipped with a photoionization detector <br /> (PID) The monitoring well logs with well construction diagrams and PID measurements are <br /> included as Appendix C <br /> To further evaluate the extent of impacted soil, the soil samples collected at 15, 25 and 80 feet <br /> bgs from all three soil borings, at 40 feet bgs from the boring for MW-2, and at 60 feet bgs from <br /> the borings for MW-1 and MW-3 were submitted for laboratory analysis These soil samples were <br /> sealed with Teflon®film and plastic end caps, labeled, and transported in an iced cooler with <br /> chain-of-custody documentation to Kiff Analytical, LLC (Kiff), a state of California certified <br /> rhazardous waste testing laboratory (Certification #2236) <br /> Kiff analyzed each of the soil samples for TPH-as-gasoline, BTEX, MTBE, DIPE, ETBE, TAME, <br /> TBA, and 1,2-DCA by EPA Method 8260B <br /> 10 <br />