My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_PRE 2019
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
E
>
EL PINAL
>
1412
>
2200 - Hazardous Waste Program
>
PR0220094
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_PRE 2019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/3/2019 4:37:31 PM
Creation date
4/18/2019 10:56:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2200 - Hazardous Waste Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
PRE 2019
RECORD_ID
PR0220094
PE
2247
FACILITY_ID
FA0001479
FACILITY_NAME
SUMIDEN WIRE PRODUCTS CORPORATION
STREET_NUMBER
1412
STREET_NAME
EL PINAL
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
117-360-40
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
1412 EL PINAL DR
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
KBlackwell
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
660
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I August 4 , 1992 (the "Judgment" ) , and thereafter the Judgment <br /> 2 became final . <br /> 3 7 . DTSC had concurred in the terms of the <br /> 4 stipulation including those which required the Defendants <br /> 5 to install acid regeneration equipment, to pay generator <br /> 6 fees , to reimburse the DA and DTSC for investigation costs , <br /> 7 and to pay civil penalties , in the total amount of <br /> 8 $442 , 137 . 50 . <br /> 9 8 . On Friday, September 25 , 1992 , Sumiden was <br /> .1.0 notified that the State Board of Equalization (the "Board" ) <br /> 11 would conduct an audit on Tuesday, September 29 , 1992 . when <br /> 12 the Board's representatives arrived at Sumiden , they were <br /> 13 provided with a copy of the Judgment. Sumiden was willing <br /> 14 to proceed with the audit, but advised the Board that <br /> 15 certain issues were moot because of the final Judgment. An <br /> 16 agreement was reached whereby Sumiden extended the statute <br /> 17 of limitations applicable to the Board to allow the Board an <br /> 18 opportunity to formulate a legal opinion. The Board failed <br /> 19 to provide any legal opinion or basis for the proposed <br /> 20 audit. <br /> 21 9 . On January 29 , 1993 , the Board issued two <br /> 22 Notices of Determination for generator fees in the amounts <br /> 23 of $72 , 193 . 69 and $2 , 977 . 25 . Sumiden timely appealed ; the <br /> 24 Board has failed to set the matter for hearing or otherwise <br /> 25 to act on the appeal . Instead , the Board filed this Motion <br /> 26 to vacate the Judgment. <br /> 27 <br /> 28 <br /> 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.