My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO 2001 - 2006
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
K
>
KETTLEMAN
>
2448
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0231948
>
COMPLIANCE INFO 2001 - 2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/19/2022 9:19:58 AM
Creation date
4/26/2019 4:27:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
2001 - 2006
RECORD_ID
PR0231948
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0003855
FACILITY_NAME
TESORO (SHELL) 68153
STREET_NUMBER
2448
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
KETTLEMAN
STREET_TYPE
LN
City
LODI
Zip
95240
APN
05814001
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
2448 W KETTLEMAN LN
P_LOCATION
02
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
KBlackwell
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
335
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
monitoring System Certification <br /> Site Address: 2448 W KETTLEMAN LN Date of Testing/Service: 05/30/2006 <br /> @ LOWER SACRAMENTO RD <br /> F. In-Tank Gauging / SIR Equipment Check this box if tank gauging is used only for inventory control. <br /> ❑ Check this box if no tank gauging or SIR equipment is installed. <br /> This section must be completed if in-tank gauging equipment is used to perform leak detection monitoring. <br /> Complete the following checklist: <br /> ❑Yes F-1 No Has all input wiring been inspected for proper entry and termination, including testing for ground faults? <br /> ❑Yes ❑No Were all tank gauging probes visually inspected for damage and residue buildup? <br /> ❑Yes ❑No' Was accuracy of system product level readings tested? <br /> ❑Yes F1 No Was accuracy of system water level readings tested? <br /> ❑Yes ❑No' Were all probes reinstalled properly? <br /> ❑Yes ❑No Were all items on the equipment manufacturers'maintenance checklist completed? <br /> * In the Section H, below,describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected. <br /> G. Line Leak Detectors (LLD) ❑ Check this box if LLDs are not installed. <br /> Complete the following checklist: <br /> 0 Yes ❑No <br /> For equipment start-up or annual equipment certification,was a leak simulated to verify LLD performance? <br /> ❑NiA (Check all that apply)Simulated leak rate: x 3 h 0.1 h 0.2 h <br /> ❑ 9.p. ❑ g.p. ❑ g.p. <br /> ❑X Yes ❑No Were all LLDs confirmed operational and accurate within regulatory requirements? <br /> M Yes 1:1 No Was the testing apparatus properly calibrated? <br /> ❑x Yes F-1 No ❑VA For mechanical LLDs,does the LLD restrict product flow if it detects a leak? <br /> ❑Yes ❑No' ❑x N;A For electronic LLDs,does the turbine automatically shut off if the LLD detects a leak? <br /> ❑Yes ❑No' ❑X NA For electronic LLDs,does the turbine automatically shut off if any portion of the monitoring system is disabled or disconnected? <br /> ❑Yes ❑No' ❑x N/A For electronic LLDs,does the turbine automatically shut off if any portion of the monitoring system malfunctions or fails a test? <br /> ❑Yes ❑No' ❑X N.A For electronic LLDs, have all accessible wiring connections been visually inspected? <br /> MYes ❑No' Were all items on the equipment manufacturers'maintenance checklist completed? <br /> * In the Section H,below,describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected. <br /> H. Comments: <br /> Page 3 of 3 Based on CA form dated 03/01 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.