My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO 2007 - 2009
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
K
>
KETTLEMAN
>
2448
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0231948
>
COMPLIANCE INFO 2007 - 2009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/19/2022 9:31:54 AM
Creation date
4/29/2019 9:19:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
2007 - 2009
RECORD_ID
PR0231948
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0003855
FACILITY_NAME
TESORO (SHELL) 68153
STREET_NUMBER
2448
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
KETTLEMAN
STREET_TYPE
LN
City
LODI
Zip
95240
APN
05814001
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
2448 W KETTLEMAN LN
P_LOCATION
02
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
KBlackwell
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
346
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
AUG-28-2007 13:28 Service Station Systems 408 938 8888 P.04 <br /> Monitoring System Certification-Pa of 3 <br /> Site Address: 2448 W. Kettleman Ln. @ Lower Sacramento Date of Testing/Seryicing: <br /> D. Results of Testing/Servicing <br /> Software Version Installed, <br /> Complete the following checklist: <br /> ❑ Yes ❑ No* Is the audible alarm operational? <br /> ❑ Yes ❑ No* is the visual alarm operational? <br /> ❑ Yes ❑ No* Were all sensors visually inspected, functionally tested, and confirmed operational,, <br /> ❑ Yes ❑ No* Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and position d so that other equipment will <br /> not interfere with their proper operation? <br /> ❑ Yes ❑ No* If alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station, is all communications eq tpment(e.g. modem) <br /> ❑ N/A operational? <br /> ❑ Yes ❑ No* For pressurized piping systems, docs the turbine automatically shut doZnnection? <br /> the piping secondary containment <br /> ❑ N/A monitoring system detects a leak, [ails to operate, or is electrically discted? If yes: which sensors initiate <br /> positive shut-down? (Check all that apply) ❑ Sump/Trench Sensors; ispenser Containment Sensors. <br /> Did you confirm positive shut-down due to leaks and sensor failure/dis ❑ Yes 0 No <br /> ❑ Yes 0 No* For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tan overfill warning device(i.e. no <br /> ❑ N/A mechanical overfill prevention valve is installed), is the overfill wa mg alann visible and audible at the tank <br /> CI1 point(s)and operating properly? If so, at what percent of tank apacity does the alarm trigger? % <br /> o Yes* ❑ No Was any monitoring equipment replaced? If yes, identify specifi sensors, probes, or other equipment replaced <br /> and list the manufacturer name and model for all replacement p s in Section E, below. <br /> ❑ Yes* ❑ No Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems signed as dry systems? (Check all that apply) <br /> 0 Product;❑ Water_ If yes, describe causes in Section E,b ow, <br /> ❑ Yes ❑ No* Was monitoring system set-up reviewed to ensure proper se Ings? (,,Ittachset-up report <br /> s i n livable. <br /> ❑ Yes ❑ No* Is all monitoring equipment operational per manufacturer' specifications? <br /> k In Section E below,describe how and when these deficiencies were or 1 II be corrected. <br /> E. Comments: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.