Laserfiche WebLink
SWJRCB,January 2002 Page <br /> 4. TANK ANNULAR TESTING <br /> Test Method Developed By: X"Manufacturer 0 Industry Standard 0 Professional Engineer <br /> 0 Other(Sped) <br /> Test Method Used: 0 Pressure Kacuum 0 Hydrostatic <br /> 0 Other(Specify) <br /> Test Equipment Used: 6--eS4-- et r <br /> 010 Ltu w Fvw f)1Vr4cyAtj C-,,kw I ei 14-q. Equipment Resolution: —117--3e) 0-1 <br /> 10 <br /> E51 .- -, ll 02 <br /> Tank# Tank# 2- f-'3 <br /> Yank# ank# <br /> Is Tank Exempt From Testing?' 0 Yes o 0 Yes o 0 Yes DNo D Yes 0 No/ <br /> Tank Capacity: 12-V-- L2 l t i d- (' <br /> Tank Material: Q. ys 6-(a'55 15 <br /> Tank Manufacturer: [-/(OAQYVA <br /> Product Stored: <br /> ?-n 4. <br /> Wait time ot, en applying <br /> pressure� acuu ater and <br /> starting tes . I No,6 t& <br /> Test Start Time: 9100 00 <br /> Initial Reading(RI): — to R-1. W ". <br /> Test End Time: tw- 0 ejo , <br /> Final Reading(RF): LO IA-1- <br /> Test Duration: <br /> L,,-c)u <br /> Change in Reading(RF-Rj): & "- & <br /> Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: 6 L03 S L0S5 iV' <br /> Test Result: Pass 0 Fail XPass 0 Fail El PVss 0 F '] 0 ass Elail <br /> Was sensor removed for testing? es 0 No 0 NA es 0 No 0 NA El Y El No DAA 0 es El No kA— <br /> Was sensor properly replaced and <br /> verified functional 0 No 0 NA DNo DNAmctional after testing? A-�es /Yes 0 No 0 N\ /Yes 0 No 0-11\ <br /> Comments-(include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests) <br /> Secondary containment systems where the continuous monitoring automatically monitors both the primary and secondary <br /> containment,such as systems that are hydrostatically monitored or under constant vacuum, are exempt from periodic containment <br /> testing. (California Code of Regulations,Title 23, Section 2637(a)(6)) <br />