Laserfiche WebLink
6, d <br /> 21 June 1996 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 95-0114 <br /> Page 3 of 4 <br /> 3.2. COLLECTION OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES <br /> After stabilization, water samples were collected from each well using new disposable bailers. <br /> Immediately upon retrieval, the samples were transferred into 40-m1 EPA vials containing <br /> hydrochloric acid as a sample preservative. The samples were transported in a chilled container to <br /> Alpha Analytical Laboratories (AAL) in Ukiah, California. Each sample was analyzed for TPH-ss <br /> and BTE&X in accordance with EPA methods GCFID/5030 and 602, respectively. <br /> 4.0. FINDINGS <br /> 4.1. GROUNDWATER GRADIENT AND DIRECTION <br /> During the March 1996 sampling,the depth to ground water at the site ranged from 32.20 to 34.63 <br /> feet below tops of well casings. The relative ground water elevation at the site increased between <br /> 1.77 feet(MW-1)and 3.97 feet (MW-2). Relative ground water elevations are summarized in Table <br /> 1. <br /> Between December 1995 and March 1996, ground water flow direction rotated from northeast to ? <br /> southwest. The calculated gradient for March 1996 is consistent with previous measurements at the r <br /> siteGround water flow direction is depicted in Figure 3 - Relative Ground Water Elevation. r <br /> Ole <br /> 4.2. PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON-IMPACTED GROUND WATER <br /> During the March 1996 sampling, TPH-ss was detected in MW-1, MW-2 and MW-3 at <br /> concentrations of 200,450 and 2,600,ug/l(micrograms per liter, equivalent to parts per billion: ppb), <br /> respectively. TPH-ss or BTE&X were not detected in any of the other samples collected during the <br /> March 1996 sampling. Analytical results of ground water samples are summarized in Table 2. The <br /> laboratory report(AAL Batch Number 96-0320-018) and chain-of-custody are included in Appendix <br /> C. <br /> 5.0. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> 5.1. HYDROCARBON-IMPACTED SOIL AND REMEDIATION <br /> Hydrocarbon-impacted soil remains in the area of the former UST excavation. Additional subsurface <br /> investigation may be required in the vicinity of the former UST excavation to determine the lateral <br /> and vertical extent of the impacted soil. <br />