Laserfiche WebLink
� I 7�7t � .:,PYA',n F �' + ly�,. t Yi- � i i`�•. I '"� Y st.; i a 5 r: -., ' -'� 5 s <br /> - <br /> i ,i - i. ' t �i - Yi' - I . n • I.' <br /> i l <br /> (til 1 I a .• _ '- 3 ' i r a}, .a. f - }i I y. , ''i I �' 1 . <br /> April I � •'i 11,y <br /> :• I �{ 5' ril 2005 <br /> `AGE=NC-ProectNa.•98=0504 <br /> a q, 1. <br /> ,r 'Page2'of 4 <br /> r, transportation under of custody to Cal Tech Environmental Laboratories(CTEL),'a California " I <br /> .. <br /> DepartmentIof Health Services(DHS)-certified analytical laboratory in Paramount;California-. The <br /> r ;samples were analyzed for., <br /> Total petroleum,hydrocarbons;quantified as gasoline {TPH-g}.in accordance'with EPA '' f <br /> ' Method 8015 Modified; and <br /> 'Benzene,',toluene, ethylbenzene,. and total:xylenes (BTEX)and fuel additives di-isopropyl'..`. +5' ' <br /> ether.(DIPE},ethyl tertiary 11 <br /> methyl tertiary-butyl ether(MTBE),'tertiary�" <br /> 'am tmeth 1 ether JAMEtertiary-butyl.aleohol TBA 1 2-dichloroethane 1 2-DCA arid; <br /> 1,2-rdibromoethane (EDB) in accordance with'EPA'Method K6613. <br /> 4,. 3.0. ' FINDINGS J <br /> ` Ground water elevations, flow direction;and gradient were determined from field data collected on <br /> 03 November 2004.The contaminant impact to ground water was quantified by laboratory analytical <br /> data. <br /> . 3.1. -GROUND WATER GRADIENT AND FLOW DIRECTION <br /> At-the time of the November 2004 sampling event, depths to ground water at the site ranged.'from <br /> 29.44 feet(MW73)to 29:80 feet(MW-2)below the tops of the well casings. Ground water elevation <br /> t at the site averaged approximately 20.82 feet'-below mean sea level (MSL), indicating,an..average <br /> decrease,in ground water elevation of-1.20 feet since the last monitoring event'in August 2604.1-"-, <br /> Ground water elevation data is included in Table L <br /> ,Ground <br /> -water flow direction was calculated from the well elevation data...The ground water was <br /> inferred to flow south-southwest under a hydraulic gradient of approxim'ately 0.01•foot/foot.'(ft/ .). <br /> ' Figure 3 illustrates the contoured ground water elevations as measured on 03 N6vember_2004 ,) <br /> I ' <br /> 1.3.2. 'ANALYTICAL RESULTS OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES <br /> TPH-g and MTBE were detected in the ground water sample-collected from well MW-I at <br /> concentrations of 100 micrograms per liter 1 and 98 1 res ectivel . <br /> c P,i p (µ ) Vg/l, P y <br /> No additional'petroleum hydrocarbon compounds were detected in the samples analyzed.Analytical <br /> f� ;• : results from the ground water samples are summarized in Table 2. The laboratory report.(CTEL <br /> ''. Advanced GeoEnvironmentai,I6. <br />