My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0004682
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MADISON
>
423
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544427
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0004682
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2019 9:19:40 AM
Creation date
5/7/2019 8:39:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0004682
RECORD_ID
PR0544427
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0004581
FACILITY_NAME
CHASE CHEVROLET*
STREET_NUMBER
423
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
MADISON
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
423 N MADISON ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
' 09 October 2001 <br /> • AGE-NC Project No 95-0144 <br /> Page 4 of 5 <br /> ' 2 5 PURGED GROUND WATER DISPOSAL <br /> On 13 June 2001, the ground water extracted during the pumping test was pumped from the <br /> ' aboveground storage Baiter tank into a vacuum truck(supplied by Amencan Valley Waste Oil), the <br /> purged water was transported off-site under non hazardous waste manifest to Industnal Service Oil <br /> Co Inc , a waste treatment facility located in Los Angeles, California Documentation and uniform <br /> hazardous waste manifest for disposal of the pump test purged water is contained in Appendix F <br /> ' 3.0. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS <br /> ' The implications from the May 2001 aquifer ground water pumping test are <br /> • Ground water draw-down of at least 6 90 feet was observed in extraction well EW-1 <br /> following 7 hours of continuous pumping operation at a rate of 6 gpin, ground water draw- <br /> down was observed in well MW-21A (located 14 feet to the northeast) at 0 48 feet, well <br /> MW-19A(located 30 feet toward the south) at 0 18 feet,well EW-2(located 45 feet toward <br /> E ,i the north) at 0 09 feet and in well MW-20A (located 60 feet toward the north) at 0 07 feet <br /> (Table 2, Appendix B) <br /> • Utilizing a semi-logarithmic plot of ground water draw-down vs observation well distance <br /> ' to pumping well(Jacob straight-hne method), a best-fit line can be utilized to project a radius <br /> of influence of approximately 65 feet at 6 gpm(Appendices C and D) <br /> ' • Utilizing the Distance-Drawdown Method(Jacob straight-line method), a transmissivity was <br /> calculated at 636 ft2/day (equivalent to 4,750 gallons per day/ft) and a storativity value <br /> calculated at 0 019 (Appendix D) <br /> ' • Based on a transmissivity value of 636 ft'/day and the upper water zone aquifer thickness <br /> equal to 25 ft (screen interval'at EW-1), a hydraulic conductivity value was calculated at <br /> ' 190 ft/day, or 0 067 cm/s (Appendix C), a hydraulic conductivity of 0 067 cm/s is consistent <br /> with a screened interval located within silty to clean sand (Appendix G) <br /> • Laboratory analysis of extracted water during the pumping test detected elevated <br /> concentrations of TPH-g, TPH-d and BTEX compounds (Appendix E) <br /> • The,increased depth to ground-water observed in the deeper-screened observation wells <br /> (MW-19B, MW-20B, MW-2113) does not appear to be pumping-induced draw-down The <br /> similar values recorded (MW19B - 0 21 feet, MW20B - 0 20 feet, MW21B - 0 22 feet) <br /> despite vaned distances from the pumping well(15 to 60 feet) suggest an external influence <br /> ' not related to the pumping test (i e , tidal effect, other local ground water pumping) <br /> Advaneed GeuEnvtronment4 Inc <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.