Laserfiche WebLink
' 07 February 2000 <br /> • AGE-NC Project No 95-0144 <br /> Page 2 of 4 <br /> 2 2 COLLECTION OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES <br /> 1 <br /> The depth to water was remeasured immediately following purging in each well to determine <br /> recharge A minimum of 80 percent recharge was observed In each well, except MW-19A,MW-20B <br /> and MW-21B immediately after purging Water samples were collected from each purged well using <br /> new disposable bailers Samples were transferred into 40-m1 EPA-approved VOA vials containing <br /> ' 0 5 ml 18% hydrochloric acid as a sample preservative and into 1-liter amber bottles without <br /> preservative The samples were labeled, stored on ice and transported under chain-of-custody to <br /> McCampbell Analytical, Inc (MAI), a California Department of Health Services (DHS)-certified <br /> ' analytical laboratory Each sample was analyzed for <br /> • Total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline(TPH-g),diesel (TPH-d) and motor oil <br /> ' (TPH-mo) in accordance with EPA Methods 5030/8015m, and <br /> • Volatile aromatic hydrocarbons-benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and total xylenes (BTEX) <br /> and methyl tertiary-butyl ether(MTBE) in accordance with EPA Method 8020/602 <br /> Samples collected from wells MW-19A&B,MW-20A&B and MW-21A&B were also analyzed <br /> ,for <br /> • Volatile organic compounds and fuel oxygenates, di-isopropyl ether (DIPE), ethyl tertiary- <br /> butyl ether(ETBE),MTBE,tertiary-amyl methyl ether(TAME) and tertiary butanol (TBA) <br /> in accordance with EPA Method 8260 modified <br /> 1 ' <br /> 3.0. FINDINGS <br /> Ground water elevation and flow direction were calculated from field data, hydrocarbon-impact to <br /> ground water was inferred from laboratory analysis of the ground water samples <br /> ' <br /> 31 RELATIVE R WATER ELEVATION AND GRADIENT <br /> GROUND <br /> ' The elevation of ground water in each well was calculated by subtracting the depth to water from the <br /> surveyed casing elevation(Table 1) Between August and November 1999, ground water elevation <br /> ' decreased an average of 10 1 feet in monitoring wells MW-19B, MW-20B and MW-21B, screened <br /> below a clay layer Ground water elevation decreased an average of 125 feet in the remaining wells <br /> The approximate hydraulic gradient for the November 1999 monitoring event was calculated to be <br /> ' 0 003 ft/ft with a northerly flow direction Ground water elevation contours derived from data <br /> . collected on 08 November 1999 are depicted in Figure 3 Ground water was between approximately <br /> 0 1 and 3 5 feet above the screened interval in monitoring wells MW-1, MW-2,MW-4 and MW-13 <br /> ' r Advanced Geo Environmental,Inc <br /> 1 <br /> i ' <br />