Laserfiche WebLink
Dec 31 02 1 1: 02a Frai n Hi 11 55961 467 <br />J� <br />SwRCB. Januar, 2002 MAR 2 6 2W3 <br />4 TANK ANNTTLARTR.CTTN(: <br />p.7 <br />Page 2 of 7 <br />Test Method Developed By: ❑ Tank Manufacturer Industry Standard ❑ Professional Engineer <br />D Other (Spec) <br />Test Method Used: D Pressure Vacuum 0 Hydrostatic <br />❑ Other (Sped)) <br />Test Equipment Uscd: Equipment Resolution: <br />♦♦ <br />R'' d <br />Tank # t' Tank # Tank # Tank # <br />Is Tank Exempt From Testing" <br />Yes No <br />L Yes kNo D Yes I No ❑ Yes ❑ No <br />Tank Capacity: <br />Tank Material: <br />j fre (- F,'h��jz, <br />5*ee1 ,F, *-6A55 <br />Tank Manufacturer: <br />p� <br />pciY <br />Product Stored: <br />�l <br />r"e r►,i'N rY, <br />Wait time between applying <br />pressure/vacuum/water and <br />starting test: <br />U r <br />Test Start Time: <br />: Lf <br />Initial Reading (Rt): <br />— <br />Test End Time: <br />Final Reading (RF): <br />Test Duration: <br />Change in Reading (RF -Rt): <br />t <br />Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: <br />Test Result: <br />Pass ❑ Fail <br />❑ Pass D Fail 0 Pass D Fail <br />0 Pass ❑ Fail <br />Was sensor removed for testing? <br />R Yes D No ❑ NA <br />❑ Yes ONO DNA 0 Yes 0 No ❑ NA <br />❑ Yes 0 No 0 NA <br />Was sensor properly replaced and <br />verified functional after testino? <br />-,Yes ❑ No ❑ NA <br />0 Yes ❑ No 0 NA ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA <br />0 Yes ❑ No ❑ NA <br />Comments —(include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow -u for failed tests) <br />k.. <br />' Secondary containment systems where the continuous monitoring automatically monitors both the primary and secondary <br />containment, such as systems that are hydrostatically monitored or under constant vacuum, are exempt from periodic containment <br />testing. {California Code of Regulations, Title 23, Section 2637(a)(6)) <br />