My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO 2006 - 2011
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MAIN
>
1100
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0506504
>
COMPLIANCE INFO 2006 - 2011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2019 9:44:41 AM
Creation date
5/10/2019 4:24:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
2006 - 2011
RECORD_ID
PR0506504
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0007464
FACILITY_NAME
MAIN STREET ARCO AM PM*
STREET_NUMBER
1100
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
MAIN
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
MANTECA
Zip
95337
APN
22119062
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
1100 S MAIN ST
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
KBlackwell
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
382
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
. s � <br /> S W RCB, January 2002 Page T of <br /> 8. FILL RISER CONTAINMENT SUMP TESTING <br /> Facility is Not Equipped With Fill Riser Containment Sumps -] <br /> Fill Riser Containment Sumps are Present, but were Not Tested l i <br /> Test Method Developed By: 1 Sump Manufacturer Industry Standard V13rofessional Engineer <br /> ❑Other(Spec) <br /> Test Method Used: Pressure C Vacuum xlydrostatic <br /> Other(Specify) <br /> Test Equipment Used: Ca L d we l( 1-c.v.¢_l.. Equipment Resolution: U U-.- <br /> Fill Sum # Fill Sump# y Fill Sump# 3 ;Fill Sump# <br /> Sump Diameter: 8 '' 2'I 4Y2-11 <br /> Sump Depth: <br /> Height from Tank Top to Top of <br /> Highest Piping Penetration: c&,S <br /> Height from Tank Top to Lowest <br /> Electrical Penetration: <br /> Condition of sump prior to <br /> testing: <br /> Portion of Sump Tested '°r t:eA,,Lc 3B" 4-`V1' <br /> Sump Material: r-" 2r. :,s3 F" " <br /> Wait time between ap lying <br /> pressure/vacuum/ ater d <br /> starting test: l0 l -r o f c+4 *S M-,t r-i«4 <br /> Test Start Time: /1 ; 5-5- /.I lyd ' 2S <br /> Initial Reading(111): C 0 rc 60 .S---Cn-c( <br /> Test End Time: l.' 2 y- 2_'t <br /> Final Reading(RF): 4- C/3- - rt "")-e (,p5 4- . 1 <br /> Test Duration: —u S 3o,,,-f rnK r'f -r <br /> Change in Reading(RF-Rj): a G ,.- t N e CC c.,.,a rtl o C 41 4 <br /> Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: ,o a s' 3 o rn . o o r r•.:� ae S urr�4r- <br /> Test Result: Pass ❑ Fail Pass ❑ Fail ass ❑ Fail ❑ Nis Fail <br /> Is there a sensor in the sump? nes 11 No es ❑No es ❑No ❑ Y s No <br /> Does the sensor alarm when <br /> either product or water is Yes ❑No C NA XYes C No ❑NA �Z?es C No ❑NA ❑Y 0 No NA <br /> detected? <br /> Was sensor removed for testing? [X es G No 0 NA es ❑No 1.7 NA 4Yes ❑No G NA E es ❑No NA <br /> Was sensor properly replaced and es 11 No F-1NA 'es F]No r]NA Yes C No E-1NAYes 11No ❑ A <br /> verified functional after testing? <br /> Comments- (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended jbllow-up for failed tests) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.