Laserfiche WebLink
Project No. JB -314 <br />24 March 2003 <br />Page 4 <br />5.0 DISCUSSIONS <br />5.1 General <br />The recommendations contained in this report are based on the assumption that <br />the soil conditions encountered during construction are similar to those disclosed <br />by our exploration. If variations are noted during construction, Korbmacher <br />Engineering, Inc. should be notified so that we can supplement our <br />recommendations, as applicable. <br />Final grading plans were not available at the time of preparing this report. We <br />recommend the final grading plans be reviewed by our office prior to starting the <br />earthwork operations. <br />Laboratory test results indicate the near surface soils are highly expansive and <br />could be subject to movements with increased moisture content. These surface <br />soils are not the best material for support of foundations, building floor slabs, and <br />exterior flatwork/sidewalks in their present state. To help reduce the potential for <br />heaving clayey soils, the on-site soils should be over -excavated, moisture - <br />conditioned, and recompacted in the convenience store area as recommended in <br />the earthwork section of this report. In addition, we recommend placing <br />imported non -expansive fill, Class 4 material, lime -treated fill or an approved <br />equivalent beneath concrete slabs -on -grade for the building pad area. <br />Provided the earthwork recommendations are followed, it is our opinion that the <br />proposed kiosk, canopy structure, and sign/monuments may be supported on a <br />conventional foundation system established on compacted, engineered fill. As an <br />alternate, the canopy structure and sign/monuments may be supported on drilled, <br />cast -in place pier foundation or a deep isolated footing system established in the <br />native soil. <br />Proper drainage must be provided to prevent moisture from penetrating beneath <br />foundations, concrete slabs -on -grade, and pavements. If moisture penetrates the <br />soils beneath these areas, there could be some movement and resulting <br />cracking/distress. Recommendations to help reduce the movement of the <br />foundations and concrete slab -on -grade floors/flatwork are discussed in later <br />sections of this report. <br />5.2 Geotechnical Hazards <br />Risk of geotechnical hazards will always exist due to uncertainties of geologic <br />conditions and the unpredictability of seismic activity in the area. However, in our <br />opinion, based on available data, there are no indications of geotechnical hazards <br />that would preclude use of the site for the proposed development. The proposed <br />MKorbmacher Engineering, Inc. <br />