Laserfiche WebLink
AEGEIVEL <br />MAR 2 3 2015 <br />4. FILL RISER CONTAINMENT SUMP TESTING A1111r4 IAI W ALTA l <br />Facility is Not Equipped With Fill Riser Containment Sumps ❑— <br />Fill Riser Containment Sumps are Present, but were Not Tested ❑ <br />Test Method Developed By: ❑ Sump Manufacturer ® Industry Standard ❑ Professional Engineer <br />❑ Other (Specify) <br />Test Method Used: ❑ Pressure ❑ Vacuum ® Hydrostatic <br />❑ Other (Specify) <br />Test Equipment Used: Incon Sump <br />Tester Equipment Resolution: +1- 0.002" <br />.... .... . <br />... <br />Vent Sump <br />Sump Diameter: <br />18" <br />Sump De the <br />31" <br />Height from Tank Top to Top of <br />Highest Piping Penetration: <br />81, <br />Height from Tank Top to Lowest <br />Electrical Penetration: <br />10" <br />Condition of sump prior to <br />testing: <br />Good <br />Portion of Sump Tested <br />2" above pipin <br />Sump Material: <br />Fiberglass <br />Wait time between applying <br />pressure/vacuum/waterand <br />starting test: <br />30 minutes <br />Test Start Time: <br />3:19 pm <br />Initial Reading (R,): <br />3.8725 <br />Test End Time: <br />3:30. pm <br />Final Reading (RF): <br />3.8723 <br />Test Duration: <br />15 min. <br />Chane in Reading (RF -R,): <br />0.0002 <br />Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: <br />+/- 0.002" <br />Test Result: <br />® Pass ❑ Fail <br />Is there a sensor in the sump? <br />0 Yes ❑ No <br />Does the sensor alarm when <br />either product or water is <br />detected? <br />❑ Yes ❑ No ® NA <br />Was sensor removed for testing? <br />❑ Yes ❑ No ®NA <br />Was sensor properly replaced and <br />verified functional after testin ? <br />❑Yes []No ® NA <br />Comments — (include information on repairs made prior to testing and recommended follow-up for Jailed tests) <br />Sensor functionality was not confirmed. This procedure is not part of the Secondary Containment testing scope of work <br />Replaced Penetration Boots in Vent Sump. <br />