Laserfiche WebLink
Page 2 of 3 <br /> System Design <br /> The ozone injection well will target the zone of highest ground water concentrations in <br /> the source area. The proposed well will be located just up gradient of well MW-2 (Figure <br /> 2- Site Plan) and the sparge point (the micro-porous section) will be installed at the <br /> bottom of the aquifer thickness to be remediated. This design will provide proper lateral <br /> and vertical dispersion of the released ozone and ensure adequate coverage of the plume. <br /> Cone penetrometer data (Gregg 2002) indicate that the 30-ft to 65-ft depth of the <br /> saturated zone is comprised mainly of silt interspersed with fingers of sandy silt, clayey <br /> silt and cemented sand. The sparging literature and sparge point manufacturer guidelines <br /> suggest that the desirable range of permeability for air or ozone sparging is 10-1 to 10-5 <br /> centimeters per second. These fine-grained materials are likely near the lower end of the <br /> desirable permeability range but may still be feasible for sparging. The radius of <br /> influence (ROI) is related to injection depth, soil permeability, and interconnected pore <br /> channels present in the subsurface. <br /> The proposed injection well specifications are as follows- <br /> IW-I, 2-inch diameter, PVC Schedule 80, 0.020 slot size, screened 55-65 feet, with a <br /> total depth of 65 feet. <br /> A commercially available, packaged ozone generatorlinjection system will be <br /> used to provide the ozone. These systems typically operate on 110-volt power <br /> and can be obtained skid-mounted with a relatively small footprint. The KVA C- <br /> Sparger ozone generator and bubbler can deliver ozone through appropriately <br /> sized tubing terminating in an 18-inch long sparge point. The system will likely <br /> require an injection pressure of 15-25 pounds per square inch. The ROI is <br /> expected to be in the range of 25 to 50 feet. Although ozone system manufacturers claim <br /> that vapor emission control is not required we believe it would be prudent to operate in <br /> conjunction with a soil vapor extraction system. <br /> Detailed design,Permitting and Installation <br /> Detailed design will require complete system sizing and selection, packaged <br /> equipment schematics, an electrical one-line diagram, piping/trench/well <br /> construction/equipment-anchoring details, and a site plan with equipment layout. <br /> A fence may be required to secure the packaged equipment and control panel. <br /> The system will likely require a building permit and electrical and fire inspections <br /> after equipment installation and before startup. We believe the detailed design <br /> can be completed within four weeks of completing the recently approved site <br /> characterization. <br /> Ground Water and Remediation System Monitoring <br /> The bubbler apparatus will be operated for an initial period of six months to <br /> evaluate the performance of this approach for reduction of COC concentrations. <br /> The network of existing and new monitoring wells (Figure 2) will be used to gage the <br /> effectiveness of the injected ozone. <br />