Laserfiche WebLink
The soil samples were reported to contain maximum c ncentrations of potentially hazardous <br /> hydrocarbon constituents in soil as follows: total petro eum hydrocarbons as gasoline fuel (4.4 <br /> mg(kg); total petroleum hydrocarbons as diesel or oil ,400 mg/kg); benzene (below detection <br /> limit); toluene (21 ug/kg); ethyl benzene (710 ug/kg); d total xylene (4,500 ug/kg). Analyses <br /> of the soil samples for volatile organic compounds were reported to contain: Trichloroethene (6.1 <br /> ug/kg); Tetrachloroethane (21 ug/kg); 1,4-Dichlorobe zene (78 ug/kg); and 1,2-Dichlorobenzene <br /> (44 ug/kg). Laboratory analyses of soil samples for other constituents of concern included PCB's <br /> (below detection limits). Maximum metal concentrations in the soil were reported as follows: <br /> hexavalent chrome (below detection limit); cadmium below detection limit); lead (14 mg/kg); <br /> nickel (6 mg/kg); zinc (170 mg/kg); and chrome III(10 mg/kg). <br /> PHSEHD has named Henry Hansen as a Responsible Party for the identified soil hydrocarbon <br /> contamination associated with the former underground storage tank at the subject property. <br /> PHSEHD has required Henry Hansen to conduct a limited followup sampling by a single soil <br /> boring site immediately under the former UST location to determine the vertical extent of <br /> hydrocarbon contamination. <br /> Current Soil Sampling Results <br /> Exploratory soil boring HH-SBI was located immediately over the former waste oil UST <br /> location (Exhibit 3). This soil boring was advanced using a Mobile Drill B-53 drill rig with a <br /> continuous hollow stem flite auger. The drilling contractor was Earthtec Ltd, Roseville, <br /> California. HH-SB-1 was started, sampled, and comp eted on June 16,2000. Drilling and soil <br /> sampling was conducted under the oversight of this of Fice by a State of California Certified <br /> Engineering Geologist. <br /> The soil Hite augers were steam cleaned prior to use in the hole. Soil samples were collected <br /> every five feet by a modified California split-spoon sampler using 2 1/2 inch diameter brass <br /> sleeves. All sampling equipment was decontaminated by Alquinox prior to sampling. The first <br /> sample was collected at a depth of 6.0 to 6.5 feet below ground surface. A total of eight soil <br /> samples were collected with total depth reached at 41.5 feet below ground surface. All cuttings <br /> were drummed in a 55 gallon DOT drum and left onsi e. <br /> The lithologies penetrated were primarily brown to d k brown, medium to coarse grained sand, <br /> dry, and micaceous. No indication of proximity to the groundwater table was found to be <br /> present. No odor or hydrocarbon staining was found to be present in the cuttings. <br /> A total of eight soil samples were collected from the soil boring. The soil boring was backfilled <br /> with bentonite chips to within 10 feet of the surface arid backfilled with native soil. <br /> All eight soil samples were submitted to KIFF Analytical, Davis, California under chain of <br /> custody documentation. Two soil samples, SB-1-11 0 -11.5, and SB-1 -16,0- 16.5 were <br /> 3 <br />