Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Paul Supple <br /> Arco Station No. 6100 <br /> 25775 Patterson Pass Road <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br /> MW-1, encountered low hydrocarbon concentrations in Sand 1, suggesting <br /> continued down-dip migration toward the southeast, but did not go deep enough <br /> to encounter Sand 2. The SCM appears to be technically sound and to be a <br /> useful tool for determining additional assessment needs and to guide remediation <br /> planning. Delta concluded that additional investigation of Sand 2 toward the <br /> southeast is warranted; EHD concurred with that conclusion. <br /> In a 15 October 2002 work plan (WP), Delta proposed to advance four soil <br /> borings to approximately 150 feet bsg off-site toward the southeast utilizing mud- <br /> rotary drilling to delineate and characterize free product and/or impacted ground <br /> water in Sand Unit 2 in that direction. The WP also proposed to destroy the <br /> obstructed vapor well VW-15 and to continue free product removal from MW-1 on <br /> a weekly basis. EHD approved the proposed work as necessary and adequate to <br /> continue corrective action for the site. The WP has not been implemented to date <br /> due to problems acquiring and access agreement with the adjacent property <br /> owner. <br /> The RAP evaluated five potential remediation methods to address impacted soil <br /> and ground water on the site; the methods evaluated included natural <br /> attenuation, excavation, soil vapor extraction with air bubbling (SVE/AB), dual- <br /> phase extraction (DPE), and bioremediation. The SCM recounts Resna's SVE <br /> test conducted in 1991 on VW-1 through VW-4 which recovered significant <br /> hydrocarbon mass and yielded a radius of influence of 35 feet. Delta selected <br /> SVE/AB as the most cost effective and implementable remedial alternative that <br /> accommodated site conditions. Delta demonstrated in the RAP that the bulk of <br /> impacted soil on site can be addressed utilizing the existing network of vapor <br /> wells and selected groundwater monitoring wells. <br /> In Addendum to Hydrocarbon Mass Evaluation, dated 10 September 1999, IT <br /> Group estimated that soil was impacted by 200,575 pounds of total petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPH-g) and 17,339 pounds of benzene, toluene, <br /> ethylbenzene and total xylenes (BTEX). EHD concurs with Delta's recommended <br /> remedial action as adequate and necessary to address impacted soil and <br /> perched groundwater on the site and approves implementing the proposed scope <br /> of work described in the RAP as an interim remediation measure. The RAP . <br /> cannot be accepted as final at this time because the extent of impact toward the <br /> southeast, potentially involving significant quantities of free product, has not yet <br /> been fully characterized. If the SVE/AB operation cannot be implemented by 01 <br /> September 2003, please contact EHD with a schedule for implementation. <br /> During review of site data for this evaluation, EHD noted that 1,2-dichloroethane <br /> (1,2-DCA) and ethylene dibromide (EDB) have not been part of the laboratory <br /> analytical routine. 1,2-DCA and EDB were detected in the soil sample collected <br />