My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
PATTERSON PASS
>
25775
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0543467
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/4/2020 4:20:04 PM
Creation date
5/20/2019 9:20:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0543467
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0024672
FACILITY_NAME
FORMER ATLANTIC RICHFIELD CO (ARCO) NO 6100
STREET_NUMBER
25775
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
PATTERSON PASS
City
TRACY
Zip
95377
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
25775 S PATTERSON PASS
P_LOCATION
03
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
384
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Paul Supple <br /> Arco Station No. 6100 <br /> 25775 Patterson Pass Road <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br /> MW-1, encountered low hydrocarbon concentrations in Sand 1, suggesting <br /> continued down-dip migration toward the southeast, but did not go deep enough <br /> to encounter Sand 2. The SCM appears to be technically sound and to be a <br /> useful tool for determining additional assessment needs and to guide remediation <br /> planning. Delta concluded that additional investigation of Sand 2 toward the <br /> southeast is warranted; EHD concurred with that conclusion. <br /> In a 15 October 2002 work plan (WP), Delta proposed to advance four soil <br /> borings to approximately 150 feet bsg off-site toward the southeast utilizing mud- <br /> rotary drilling to delineate and characterize free product and/or impacted ground <br /> water in Sand Unit 2 in that direction. The WP also proposed to destroy the <br /> obstructed vapor well VW-15 and to continue free product removal from MW-1 on <br /> a weekly basis. EHD approved the proposed work as necessary and adequate to <br /> continue corrective action for the site. The WP has not been implemented to date <br /> due to problems acquiring and access agreement with the adjacent property <br /> owner. <br /> The RAP evaluated five potential remediation methods to address impacted soil <br /> and ground water on the site; the methods evaluated included natural <br /> attenuation, excavation, soil vapor extraction with air bubbling (SVE/AB), dual- <br /> phase extraction (DPE), and bioremediation. The SCM recounts Resna's SVE <br /> test conducted in 1991 on VW-1 through VW-4 which recovered significant <br /> hydrocarbon mass and yielded a radius of influence of 35 feet. Delta selected <br /> SVE/AB as the most cost effective and implementable remedial alternative that <br /> accommodated site conditions. Delta demonstrated in the RAP that the bulk of <br /> impacted soil on site can be addressed utilizing the existing network of vapor <br /> wells and selected groundwater monitoring wells. <br /> In Addendum to Hydrocarbon Mass Evaluation, dated 10 September 1999, IT <br /> Group estimated that soil was impacted by 200,575 pounds of total petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPH-g) and 17,339 pounds of benzene, toluene, <br /> ethylbenzene and total xylenes (BTEX). EHD concurs with Delta's recommended <br /> remedial action as adequate and necessary to address impacted soil and <br /> perched groundwater on the site and approves implementing the proposed scope <br /> of work described in the RAP as an interim remediation measure. The RAP . <br /> cannot be accepted as final at this time because the extent of impact toward the <br /> southeast, potentially involving significant quantities of free product, has not yet <br /> been fully characterized. If the SVE/AB operation cannot be implemented by 01 <br /> September 2003, please contact EHD with a schedule for implementation. <br /> During review of site data for this evaluation, EHD noted that 1,2-dichloroethane <br /> (1,2-DCA) and ethylene dibromide (EDB) have not been part of the laboratory <br /> analytical routine. 1,2-DCA and EDB were detected in the soil sample collected <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.