Laserfiche WebLink
�j <br /> URS <br /> Ms Margaret Lagorio, Supervising REHS Page 2 of 7 <br /> . San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department <br /> February 16, 2005 <br /> required during the second phase of the assessment In addition, in its letter dated October 14, 2004, <br /> SJCEHD reaffirmed its interest in defining/monitoring the eastern extent of impacted groundwater <br /> between the site and City of Lodi municipal well#1R (812 feet east of the site) <br /> ASSESSMENT ACTIVITIES AND FINDINGS <br /> Between November 20, 2004, and November 30, 2004, URS conducted the following field activities as <br />' part of phase I1 of the assessment <br /> i <br /> + One vertical soil boring (B-28) was advanced to first encountered groundwater on the northern <br />�f side of Lodi Avenue, approximately 180 feet west of the site, and depth-discrete soil samples <br /> and a grab groundwater sample were collected to define the western extent of 1,2-DCA- <br /> impacted groundwater <br /> + One vertical soil boring was advanced to 70 feet bgs on the eastern side of S Cherokee Lane, <br /> and a 2-inch diameter monitoring well (MW-4) was installed to monitor the eastern extent of <br /> impacted groundwater between the site and the City of Lodi municipal well <br /> • One vertical soil boring was advanced to 105 feet bgs onsite and a 2-inch diameter deep <br /> groundwater monitoring well (MW-5) was installed in the area reporting the highest 1,2-DCA <br /> concentration to assess the vertical extent of impacted groundwater <br /> Boring locations and analytical results for each drilling event are shown on Figure 2 Cascade Drilling <br /> of Rancho Cordova, California, drilled the soil borings and installed the wells using a hollow-stem auger <br /> (HSA)-equipped drill rig with 8 25-inch, outside-diameter(OD) augers Following is a discussion of <br /> subsurface conditions, soil sampling, grab groundwater sampling, laboratory analytical methods, <br /> shallow and deep monitoring well installation, groundwater monitoring well development, sampling, <br /> and surveying, soil and groundwater analytical results, and equipment decontamination and soil cutting <br /> and wastewater disposal procedures <br /> Subsurface Conditions <br /> Recent drilling activities confirmed previously collected information about the subsurface geology at the <br /> site Soil encountered during these activities consisted of sand, silty sand, sandy silt, and silt A URS <br /> geologist logged the soils encountered according to the Unified Soil Classification System Groundwater <br /> was encountered in poorly graded sand at approximately 617 feet bgs in boring B-28, at approximately <br /> 60 5 feet bgs in groundwater monitoring well MW4, and at approximately 61 5 feet bgs in groundwater <br /> monitoring well MW-5 Boring logs are presented as Attachment B <br /> Soil Sampling <br /> Soil samples were collected from all three borings at 10-foot intervals with a modified California split- <br /> spoon sampler A portion of each sample was used for lithologic logging and for headspace screening <br /> with a photoionization detector(PID) A portion of selected samples was retained and submitted to the <br /> laboratory for analysis Each soil sample retained for chemical analysis was collected in 6-inch brass <br /> K 1WprocessUS BP ARCO\0076012004 AssessmenA760 addctional assessment report 04 doc <br />