Laserfiche WebLink
3rd Quarter Report - Beacon Station #695 3 December 1992 <br /> elevated concentrations between the pump islands and east of the tank <br /> field again appeared in the data. The apparent decline is at least <br /> partially attributed to the fact that a different field instrument (flame <br /> ionization detector) was being used while the usual OVA unit was being <br /> serviced. In several cases the detector was extinguished due to low <br /> oxygen, this understating the actual concentration. <br /> The concentration rose slightly in RW-1. Consequently, the valve for RW- <br /> 1 was opened, thus providing dilution air to the SHIES from this large, <br /> recovery well . RW-1 is a 6" diameter well with a screened interval <br /> extending all the way from 33 to 80' below grade. The introduction of <br /> RW-1 to the SVES decreased the system vacuum to 5.5" Hg. <br /> Well MW-2 was finally cleared of water but remained closed due to low <br /> concentration. <br /> 13 August 1992 Monitoring: <br /> The system operated continuously since the previous monitoring. The <br /> familiar plume pattern featuring primary and secondary areas of high <br /> concentrations between the pump islands and east of the tank field, <br /> respectively, again appeared in the data. There were no extraction point <br /> valve positions changed on this date with all valves remaining open <br /> except MW-2 and MW-15. <br /> Vapor concentrations increased substantially at RW--1 with the laboratory <br /> analysis of a verification air sample confirming a high concentration of <br /> 3,200 ppm. Concentrations at RW-1 had been non-detect as recently as <br /> 16 June 1992 <br /> The extraction pump system was operating at 95% of the rated load <br /> capacity of the electric drive motor. The system influent concentration <br /> increased slightly to 1,500 ppm with the SVES extracting approximately <br /> 153 lbs/day of hydrocarbon from the soil . <br /> The contract lab analysis of the influent benzene concentration was <br /> suspect due to a non-detect result associated with the 1,500 ppm total <br /> hydrocarbon concentration. <br /> It was noted that the system appeared to be underperforming in terms of <br /> flowra+e Measures to increase performance were discussed including <br /> checking filters, repulleying, rewiring to 460 volts and possibly using <br /> a higher rated drive motor for the vacuum pump. <br /> 26 August 1992 Monitoring: <br /> The SVES operated continuously until 24 August at which time the system <br /> went down apparently due to lack of fuel . The system was restarted on 25 <br /> August and the monitoring rescheduled for 26 August to allow sufficient <br /> purge time. <br /> -4- <br />