Laserfiche WebLink
3rd Quarter Report - Beacon Station #695 3 December 1992 <br /> both the shallow (4 to 20' below grade screened interval ) and deeper (41 <br /> to 71' below grade screened interval) regions. <br /> A secondary region of elevated concentrations was also evident on the <br /> east side of the tank field, near MW-1. <br /> Water remained present in MW-2 as had been the condition since November <br /> 1991 . <br /> Ambient dilution remained open on this date. In an effort to supply <br /> dilution air from the ground rather than the atmosphere, tank field <br /> extraction points VP-5 and MW-7 (both <1 ppm) were opened to the system. <br /> This allowed for a reduction in ambient dilution. <br /> Ambient dilution was reduced to the point where the exotherm across the <br /> catalyst was maximized, thus assuring maximum removal and destruction of <br /> the contaminants. <br /> The resulting adjustments increased the system vacuum to 5.9" Hg and <br /> increased the hydrocarbon extraction rate to over 400 lbs/day. <br /> Hydrocarbon emissions were below detectable limits indicating that the <br /> catalytic abatement system was performing with an exceptionally high <br /> . destruction efficiency in excess of 99.9%. <br /> 17 July 1992 Monitoring: <br /> The SUES operated continuously until 11 July at which time the system <br /> went down due to insufficient fuel . The propane company was contacted <br /> and reminded of the need to service the site more frequently. The <br /> propane tank was refilled and the unit restarted on 13 July and allowed <br /> to purge several days prior to monitoring. <br /> On 17 July, vapor concentrations again remained high at many extraction <br /> points. The region of 10,000+ ppm concentrations between the pump <br /> islands expanded slightly toward Cherokee Lane while the secondary area <br /> of concentrations east of the tank field increased to include 10,000+ ppm <br /> the area between MW-1 and MW-17. <br /> A verification air bag sample from MW-10 was analyzed in the lab <br /> according to modified EPA Method 8015. The results indicated a <br /> concentration of 9,066 ppm, thus confirming the high reading from the <br /> field instrument. <br /> Ambient dilution was further reduced, raising the vacuum slightly to 6.0" <br /> Hg. No valve positions were changed on this date with all but 3 <br /> extraction points remaining open. <br /> 28 July 1992 Monitoring. <br /> The system operated continuously since the previous monitoring. Vapor <br /> readings at several of the high concentration extraction points appeared <br /> to decline during this monitoring However, the same general pattern of <br /> r <br /> -3- <br />