My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
PINE
>
1126
>
2800 - Aboveground Petroleum Storage Program
>
PR0527768
>
COMPLIANCE INFO
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/26/2019 2:32:27 PM
Creation date
5/28/2019 4:37:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2800 - Aboveground Petroleum Storage Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
RECORD_ID
PR0527768
PE
2832
FACILITY_ID
FA0003771
FACILITY_NAME
E F KLUDT & SONS INC
STREET_NUMBER
1126
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
PINE
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
LODI
Zip
95240
APN
04906022
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
1126 E PINE ST
P_LOCATION
02
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
FRuiz
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ruvalcaba, Cesar <br /> From: Ruvalcaba,Cesar <br /> Sent: Wednesday,July 24,2019 2:50 PM <br /> To: 'Aron Kludt' <br /> Cc: Stephen Kludt <br /> Subject: RE: return to compliance-PR0527768 <br /> Attachments: Industry Standard Guidance.pdf, Mobile_Portable Containers.pdf, Open Violations.pdf <br /> Hi Aron, <br /> The return to compliance for APSA/SPCC has been reviewed. One violation has been closed based on the provided <br /> statements.A list of updated open violations is provided.The"tank testing info"file was corrupted and couldn't be <br /> opened. Most of the violations may require an amendment to the SPCC plan. Most of the amendments may fall under <br /> the technical amendment category and will require certification by a registered Professional Engineer(PE). <br /> Violation#603-Failed to adequately describe the physical layout of the facility In the Plan. <br /> - Referring to the attachments of page 9,warehouse and tank& piping which address the UST tanks and piping in <br /> question along with layout of the facility. I did want to ask if we have to write "exempt' on the location of the UST tanks <br /> since they are clearly marked"UST" and anyone doing an inspection would know they don't fall under AST? <br /> Unfortunately the regulations are very specific in this matter,resubmit a facility diagram that marks USTs as"exempt". <br /> One of the maps also seems to be missing the kerosene and racing fuel UST. The location of the sued oil tank may be <br /> incorrect in one of the diagrams. Below is what the regulations states: <br /> Describe in your Plan the physical layout of the facility and include a facility diagram, which must mark the location <br /> and contents of each fixed oil storage container and the storage area where mobile or portable containers are <br /> located. The facility diagram must identify the location of and mark as "exempt"underground tanks that are <br /> otherwise exempted from the requirements of this part under§112.1(d)(4).The facility diagram must also include all <br /> transfer stations and connecting pipes, including intra-facility gathering lines that are otherwise exempted from the <br /> requirements of this part <br /> Violation#626- Loading/unloading rack containment system not adequate to contain spill. <br /> - Referring to page 9 again it states Zone 1 which contains the area discussed has a capacity of 56,000 gallons <br /> which is well above the largest compartment getting loaded on a truck. There is a closed control valve within Zone 1 <br /> that would also stop the flow of product before reaching the oil/Water separator. There are interlock brake systems <br /> on all of our trucks that activates once piping is connected keeping them from moving until everything is <br /> disconnected. <br /> The SPCC plan needs to address the required sections of the regulations.The discussion on page 29 of the <br /> provided SPCC plan,titled 'Tank Truck Loading/Unloading Area Containment 40 CFR 112.7(h)"does not satisfy the <br /> requirements of that section.This section seems to imply that the oil water separator is the secondary containment <br /> for loading rack. It does not address the capacity of the oil water separator and the engineer does not certify that the <br /> maximum capacity of any single compartment of a tank car or tank truck loaded or unloaded at the facility would be <br /> able to be contained by the oil water separator. There were also three man holes in the area of the loading racks, <br /> these are not addressed in the SPCC plan. Would material not collect in those sumps?What is there? The addition <br /> of the missing components will need to be certified by a professional engineer. <br /> Code of Federal Regulations 112.7 <br /> (h) Facility tank car and tank truck loading/unloading rack (excluding offshore facilities). <br /> (1)Where loading/unloading rack drainage does not flow into a catchment basin or treatment facility designed to <br /> handle discharges, use a quick drainage system for tank car or tank truck loading/unloading racks. You must design <br /> any containment system to hold at least the maximum capacity of any single compartment of a tank car or tank truck <br /> loaded or unloaded at the facility. <br /> (2) Provide an interlocked warning light or physical barrier system,warning signs,wheel chocks or vehicle brake <br /> interlock system in the area adjacent to a loading/unloading rack,to prevent vehicles from departing before <br /> complete disconnection of flexible or fixed oil transfer lines. <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.