Laserfiche WebLink
Mr Peter MacNicholl <br /> February 21, 2009 <br /> Page 6 <br /> upgradient direction (the exact inverse of the downgradient capture distance for <br /> extraction) <br /> 27.Section 4.3 The lack of dieldrin in the lower zone appears to be a lucky accident <br /> caused by clogging/ inadequate development of the lower screen intervals of the <br /> injection wells and mechanical filtration of the dieldrin in fine-grained units. No <br /> adsorption is required to explain its distribution. <br /> 28.Section 4.4 GSU agrees that increasing the groundwater gradient will <br /> remobilized the dieldrin. GSU observes that groundwater velocities, while <br /> currently stable, cannot be assumed to remain so indefinitely. The section <br /> should be revised. GSU can envision situations where pumping or injection in <br /> the shallow zone can remobilize the dieldrin. <br /> 29.Section 5.3 In addition to its ordinary toxicity, dieldirin's high partition coefficient <br /> causes it to sorb to human fat. Dieldrin is thus associated with (and even found <br /> in)tumors mainly in fatty tissues (skin, breast, mesenteric, and brain). It is also a <br /> potent neurotoxin, and is implicated in Parkinson's disease, resulting from its <br /> strong affinity for brain tissue. Oral acute toxicity is actually only part of the <br /> picture. While GSU defers to HERD in these matters, GSU does not feel that <br /> the threat of exposure is sufficiently controlled and that the risk levels should be <br /> raised. <br /> 30.Section 7.0 The obvious high risk of remobilization of the plume by pumping <br /> cannot be lightly dismissed. <br /> 31.Section 8.2 The MNA alternative approach assumes that attenuation does not <br /> occur, which tends to contradict earlier discussions saying that (irreversible) <br /> sorption is a factor in plume migration. <br /> 32.Section 8.2 In situ treatment has not been sufficiently explored. Many features <br /> of this release suggest that in situ treatment might actually work: the migration in <br /> a channel of limited extent, the retention of particles along the original flow path, <br /> the stability under low gradients, all suggests that injecting a highly soluble <br /> oxidizer at the original injection sites would likely follow the same pathways and <br /> reach the resting-phase dieldrin. Injecting in other locations would likely be futile. <br /> Darcy's law requires that, for a given geometry and distribution of units, flow will <br /> follow the same pathways regardless of the gradient, because the relative <br /> velocities in different units are fixed by conductivity and area. The original <br /> injection points are known, so the flow paths are basically fixed by the geology. <br /> Treatment at the injection points is all that is needed to chase the dieldrin. The <br /> volume of oxidizer need not be much more than enough to allow for organic <br />