Laserfiche WebLink
INITIAL RELEASE DDJC Tracy <br /> the excavated material with soil that has been certified as clean. The clean soil has been capped <br /> with a layer of sod (DDJC Tracy 1995; 1997a). <br /> ATSDR evaluated whether children who attend the Day Care Center are potentially exposed to <br /> the contaminants via incidental ingestion of the play yard surface soil at levels known to cause <br /> health effects. In evaluating exposure to soil contaminants via incidental ingestion, ATSDR <br /> assumes that uptake via ingestion is greater than through skin ingestion. The methods used and <br /> assumptions applied are presented in Appendix C. ATSDR believes that the assumptions used to <br /> estimate exposure doses are very conservative and, therefore, overestimate the level of actual <br /> exposure for a child playing in the Day Care Center yard. The estimated exposure doses for a <br /> child are provided in Appendix C, Table C-3. Even using very conservative assumptions about <br /> exposure, the estimated exposure doses are lower than corresponding MRLs or RfDs. Therefore, <br /> incidental ingestion of surface soil is not expected to result in adverse health effects for young <br /> children playing in the Day Care Center yard. Even if one assumes the highly conservative <br /> assumption that contaminant concentrations entering the body through dermal contact are <br /> approximately equal to ingestion, dermal contact with surface soil likewise is unlikely to lead to <br /> adverse health effects. <br /> Areas Under Investigation <br /> A total of 66 areas have been investigated at DDJC Tracy, including 28 SWMUs, 28 USTs, and <br /> 10 areas of soil contamination. For a majority of these areas, no public health hazard exists <br /> because the levels of contamination in soil.are lower than levels associated with health hazard, <br /> exposure has been prevented by access restrictions (i.e., site security), and/or contaminated areas <br /> will be remediated. DDJC Tracy has designated certain areas of soil contamination for <br /> remediation (i.e., SWMUs 8 and 24) because they pose a potential threat to the underlying <br /> groundwater. <br /> After considering the limited access to the site and reviewing the pertinent environmental <br /> monitoring data, ATSDR determined that workers and visitors at the site are not likely to have <br /> frequent or long-term contact with contaminated soil in these areas. Exposure, if any, is not <br /> expected to result in adverse health effects. <br /> Areas of Exposed Surface Soil <br /> Most of the areas are paved or contain buildings. Few areas of exposed soil exist along the <br /> boundaries. DDJC Tracy analyzed samples from the exposed soil areas in 1993 and 1994, and <br /> Table 7 shows the results of these analyses. As the table indicates, the metals arsenic and <br /> beryllium have frequently been detected at levels above the comparison values, whereas the <br /> 14 <br />