Laserfiche WebLink
INMAL RELEASE DDJC Tracy <br /> AgriIt ral Walla• Current and Future Exposures <br /> The three agricultural wells are no longer used for irrigation, and therefore, pose no current or <br /> potential future public health hazards. The wells have been abandoned to minimize possible <br /> contaminant transport to the Lower Tulare Aquifer through well casings or gravel packs. AG-1, <br /> AG-2, and AG-3 were sealed in September 1994, December 1994, and June 1995, respectively. In <br /> the area of the AG-2 pump, the groundwater flow subsequently returned to north-northeast <br /> (Montgomery Watson, 1995). No new agricultural wells are likely to be installed in the area <br /> because California legislation allows regulatory agencies to prohibit drilling new wells within <br /> 2,000 feet of a hazardous waste site boundary. <br /> No public health hazards are associated with exposure to contaminated groundwater located <br /> beneath DDJC Tracy or in off-site areas. Site-related contaminants have not been detected in <br /> on-site water supply wells, the Tracy municipal water supply, or nearby private wells at levels <br /> that might result in adverse health effects. <br /> Contact with On-Site Surface Soil <br /> Day Care Center Play Yard <br /> Approximately 90 children attend the Day Care Center located in the northwest corner of the site. <br /> Children play in the center's 0.5 to 1 acre yard that is mostly covered with grass; however, there <br /> are areas of exposed soil. A former underground storage tank(LIST), which contained No. 2 fuel <br /> oil, was partially located within the play yard. The tank and surrounding soil were removed in <br /> 1988 (DDJC Tracy, 1997a). <br /> In 1994, DDJC Tracy collected five surface soil samples from within the play yard. The sample <br /> locations were selected to represent exposed soil areas commonly used by children. The soil <br /> samples were analyzed for semivolatile organic compounds (SVOCs), metals, and pesticides and <br /> the results are presented in Table 6. Although several contaminant concentrations (i.e., arsenic, <br /> chromium, vanadium, 1,1-dichloro-2,2-bis(p-chlorophenyl)ethylene [DDEJ, 1,1,1-trichloro-2,2- <br /> bis-(p-diphenyl)ethane [DDT], and dieldrin) exceed ATSDR's very conservative comparison <br /> values for pica behavior (frequent hand-to-mouth activity), most values are typical of regional <br /> background soil concentrations (Montgomery Watson, 1995). Lead was also detected in three of <br /> five surface soil samples at a maximum concentration of 20.3 parts per million (ppm). Although a <br /> comparison value has not been established for lead, ATSDR determined that the soil lead <br /> concentrations are much lower than levels that have been shown to contribute to elevated blood <br /> lead level in young children who might incidentally ingest soil (CDC, 1991). DDJC Tracy has <br /> since removed the top 1 foot of soil from the entire play yard and play box material and replaced <br /> 13 <br />