Laserfiche WebLink
Ramon Batista • - 3 - 11 February 2003 <br /> DEIR Phase 1 Expansion <br /> application, such application may not be allowed. In Table 3-2, which identifies wastewater storage areas, <br /> Site 7 described as "LOF Back 40"refers to an area where wastewater is already applied. The area is <br /> described in WDRs Order No. 5-01-114 and is presently used for Pilkington North America's industrial <br /> wastewater and stormwater application. The same area cannot be listed in two WDRs. Please clarify the <br /> use of such areas and an evaluation of the potential for contaminants to exist in proposed areas. <br /> Section 3.6.2 states the purple pipe requirement for recycled water, "...does not apply to water delivered <br /> for agricultural use." The basis for this statement is unknown but can be clarified when the Title 22 <br /> Recycled Water Engineering Report is submitted. <br /> Section 4.6.3 Environmental Impacts, describes runoff from land application areas as not significant. <br /> Discharge of wastewater to surface water bodies without the proper permits can result in the Regional <br /> Board taking enforcement actions, including imposition of administrative civil liabilities. The Title 22 <br /> Recycled Water Engineering Report must adequately address the runoff issue. <br /> Section 4.6.3 Environmental Impacts, describes a water balance prepared to estimate the amount of land <br /> needed for wastewater application. The water balance was not included in the DEIR; it will be required as <br /> part of the RWD. The amount of land needed for wastewater application will be evaluated by reviewing <br /> the assumptions in the water balance and the characteristics of the land application areas. The water <br /> balance must use the 100-year return annual total return period distributed monthly in accordance with <br /> historical patterns as the precipitation amount. <br /> Section 4.6.3 Environmental Impacts, states, "...even the direct discharge of tertiary-treated wastewater to <br /> the San Joaquin River associated with full build out of the WRPs proposed under the Master Plan would <br /> result in a less-than-significant impact on surface water quality." This statement is not supported and <br /> should be removed from the final EIR. <br /> Use of the wastewater for irrigation as described in the DEIR may require additional wastewater storage <br /> facilities or redundant treatment facilities because Title 22 Section 60304 requires backup measures if <br /> treatment fails. In addition, storage of wastewater in ponds after treatment will likely result in measurable <br /> total coliform organisms possibly requiring secondary disinfection prior to land application. <br /> Groundwater Characterization <br /> No information on groundwater quality is provided in the DEIR; the information will be required for the <br /> RWD. Groundwater monitoring will be required upgradient and downgradient of all land application <br /> and/or wastewater storage areas. Because of the number of land application areas that may be included in <br /> the project, a regional approach to groundwater monitoring may be acceptable. However, wastewater <br /> storage areas will require site-specific groundwater monitoring networks. Groundwater monitoring <br /> should be performed to characterize the background groundwater quality at the site. Inadequate <br /> groundwater monitoring data may result in delays evaluating the RWD while the groundwater quality is <br /> characterized. <br /> The following discussion provides information on permits required by the Regional Water Board for the <br /> project. <br /> V:\Sen_Joe uin Nonl5\Statt\ObHen nJoa uin\Mix.Cons mte Clmnnghouse\Detisu Feb 1003.do <br />