My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CHRISTOPHER
>
18800
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0523929
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/30/2019 10:47:55 AM
Creation date
5/30/2019 10:22:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0523929
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0016100
FACILITY_NAME
WRP #1/ CITY OF LATHROP
STREET_NUMBER
18800
STREET_NAME
CHRISTOPHER
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
LATHROP
Zip
95330
APN
19813035
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
18800 CHRISTOPHER WAY
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
447
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ramon Batista • - 3 - 11 February 2003 <br /> DEIR Phase 1 Expansion <br /> application, such application may not be allowed. In Table 3-2, which identifies wastewater storage areas, <br /> Site 7 described as "LOF Back 40"refers to an area where wastewater is already applied. The area is <br /> described in WDRs Order No. 5-01-114 and is presently used for Pilkington North America's industrial <br /> wastewater and stormwater application. The same area cannot be listed in two WDRs. Please clarify the <br /> use of such areas and an evaluation of the potential for contaminants to exist in proposed areas. <br /> Section 3.6.2 states the purple pipe requirement for recycled water, "...does not apply to water delivered <br /> for agricultural use." The basis for this statement is unknown but can be clarified when the Title 22 <br /> Recycled Water Engineering Report is submitted. <br /> Section 4.6.3 Environmental Impacts, describes runoff from land application areas as not significant. <br /> Discharge of wastewater to surface water bodies without the proper permits can result in the Regional <br /> Board taking enforcement actions, including imposition of administrative civil liabilities. The Title 22 <br /> Recycled Water Engineering Report must adequately address the runoff issue. <br /> Section 4.6.3 Environmental Impacts, describes a water balance prepared to estimate the amount of land <br /> needed for wastewater application. The water balance was not included in the DEIR; it will be required as <br /> part of the RWD. The amount of land needed for wastewater application will be evaluated by reviewing <br /> the assumptions in the water balance and the characteristics of the land application areas. The water <br /> balance must use the 100-year return annual total return period distributed monthly in accordance with <br /> historical patterns as the precipitation amount. <br /> Section 4.6.3 Environmental Impacts, states, "...even the direct discharge of tertiary-treated wastewater to <br /> the San Joaquin River associated with full build out of the WRPs proposed under the Master Plan would <br /> result in a less-than-significant impact on surface water quality." This statement is not supported and <br /> should be removed from the final EIR. <br /> Use of the wastewater for irrigation as described in the DEIR may require additional wastewater storage <br /> facilities or redundant treatment facilities because Title 22 Section 60304 requires backup measures if <br /> treatment fails. In addition, storage of wastewater in ponds after treatment will likely result in measurable <br /> total coliform organisms possibly requiring secondary disinfection prior to land application. <br /> Groundwater Characterization <br /> No information on groundwater quality is provided in the DEIR; the information will be required for the <br /> RWD. Groundwater monitoring will be required upgradient and downgradient of all land application <br /> and/or wastewater storage areas. Because of the number of land application areas that may be included in <br /> the project, a regional approach to groundwater monitoring may be acceptable. However, wastewater <br /> storage areas will require site-specific groundwater monitoring networks. Groundwater monitoring <br /> should be performed to characterize the background groundwater quality at the site. Inadequate <br /> groundwater monitoring data may result in delays evaluating the RWD while the groundwater quality is <br /> characterized. <br /> The following discussion provides information on permits required by the Regional Water Board for the <br /> project. <br /> V:\Sen_Joe uin Nonl5\Statt\ObHen nJoa uin\Mix.Cons mte Clmnnghouse\Detisu Feb 1003.do <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.