My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CHRISTOPHER
>
18800
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0523929
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/30/2019 10:47:55 AM
Creation date
5/30/2019 10:22:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0523929
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0016100
FACILITY_NAME
WRP #1/ CITY OF LATHROP
STREET_NUMBER
18800
STREET_NAME
CHRISTOPHER
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
LATHROP
Zip
95330
APN
19813035
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
18800 CHRISTOPHER WAY
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
447
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ramon Batista • -2 - • 11 February 2003 <br /> DEIR Phase 1 Expansion <br /> DEIR STATEMENT COMMENT <br /> Impact 4.2-b: Long Term Odor Impacts. The WDRs adopted for the proposed facility will <br /> item states, "The proposed project would result require odor control at the wastewater treatment <br /> in increased odor generating potential associated plant, all storage ponds,piping, and land <br /> with the operation wastewater conveyance application areas. The RWD must address the <br /> facilities and WRP-1 that could affect existing issue of odor control for all treatment, storage, and <br /> and planned nearby residential areas." application areas. <br /> Impact 4.6-b: Recycled Water Effects on WDRs adopted for the proposed facility will <br /> Groundwater Quality. The item states require groundwater monitoring of the first <br /> "...because the depth to potable groundwater is encountered saturated interval. Consistent with <br /> substantial (75 feet or more), the storage and the Antidegradation Policy, shallow groundwater <br /> application of recycled water would not result in quality must be protected. Groundwater <br /> the percolation of pollutants to potable monitoring wells will be required at storage and/or <br /> groundwater..." land application areas and the Monitoring and <br /> Reporting Program will require quarterly <br /> monitoring of groundwater quality. It is also noted <br /> that the fist saturated interval is likely to be less <br /> than 10 feet in some of the proposed land <br /> application areas or storage ponds. <br /> Impact 4.6-c: Potential for Violation of Surface Wastewater storage ponds must be sized to <br /> Water Quality Standards. The item states, "The provide storage for the wastewater and other <br /> project storage facilities would be sized to inflow. For the amount of rainfall to be used in the <br /> accommodate sufficient inflow to minimize the water balance, the City must use the 100-year <br /> potential of their overtopping. return annual total rainfall amount distributed <br /> monthly in accordance with normal year <br /> distribution. The water balance must also take into <br /> account any management provision of the storage <br /> pond such as described in Impact 4.8-a Vector <br /> Production, which states some water may be <br /> maintained in ponds. <br /> Additional Comments <br /> Section 3.4.2 describes expanding the wastewater treatment system in four phases over a ten-year period. <br /> If the City submits an RWD for each phase, substantial work will be required by Regional Board staff <br /> when resources are already reduced. Submitting multiple RWDs for incremental increases may result in <br /> WDRs preparation delays. The City should prepare an RWD that will describe the wastewater treatment <br /> system in no more than two phases. The WDRs can be structured to allow additional flow rates and land <br /> application areas only after submittal of technical reports and approval of the Executive Officer. <br /> Figure 3.4, Table 3.2, Table 3.3, Table 4.4-1, and Table 4.4-2 identify the wastewater storage and <br /> application areas. Some of these sites may not be suitable or may not be available for wastewater <br /> application. Table 3-3 identifies land application sites; Site Nos. 14, 15, 16, and 17 are described as <br /> "Simplot"but if contaminants exist in the proposed areas that could be mobilized by wastewater <br /> VASan_l0,uin Non l SSutAObnennSankapinMn,Co Suse Cleesi house� afista Feb 10 03.d= <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.