Laserfiche WebLink
California R#ional Water Quality Pontrol Board ;_ ' '-h <br /> Central Valley Region <br /> Steven T.Butler,Chair <br /> Winston H. Gray Davis <br /> Secretaryfor og Sacramento Main Office Governor <br /> Environmental Internet Address: http://www,swrcb.ca.gov/—mgcb5 <br /> Protection - 3443 Routier Road,Suite A,Sacramento,Califomia 95827-3003 <br /> Phone(916)255-3000•FAX(916)255-3015 <br /> 18 July 2000 <br /> Mr. Jon Crawford <br /> City of Lathrop <br /> Public Works Director <br /> 16775 Howland Road, Suite One <br /> Lathrop, CA 95330 <br /> INCOMPLETE REPORT OF WASTE DISCHARGE, PROPOSED WASTEWATER - <br /> EVAPORATIONITERCOLA TION PONDS AT CROSSROADS TREATMENT PLANT, SCJ <br /> JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> I have reviewed the 28 April 2000 "Summary Report, Geotechnical and Geologic Investigatioxs, "- <br /> prepared by Neil O. Anderson &Associates, and the May 2000 "Preliminary Wastewater Inj'&ation-� <br /> Ponds and Groundwater Subdrain Design,"prepared by Gary Litton and Siegfried Engineering. The'J <br /> reports were prepared as part of a Report of Waste Discharge (RWD) to describe a proposed plan to <br /> relocate the existing wastewater evaporation/percolation ponds from their present location to a site <br /> approximately 1,500 yards west. The relocation was evaluated as a response to poor percolation rates at <br /> the existing ponds. <br /> Six hydrologic conditions were evaluated in the reports. All of the conditions require dewatering <br /> groundwater beneath the proposed ponds to maintain a five-foot separation between the pond bottoms <br /> and the groundwater table. Dewatering flow rates would vary from approximately 0.72 million gallons <br /> per day(mgd) to 2.88 mgd. The dewatering activities would capture all of the wastewater percolating <br /> into the subsurface plus additional groundwater. The pumped water would then be discharged to the San <br /> Joaquin River without additional treatment. However, discharges to surface water require National <br /> Pollutant Discharge Elimination System(NPDES)permits and the RWD is determined to be incomplete <br /> because the selected alternative allows for wastewater to be discharged to surface waters. <br /> This condition results in your proposed wastewater discharge being considered a surface water discharge <br /> subject to the NPDES permit requirements. Considering the water quality impairments of the San <br /> Joaquin River, obtaining a NPDES permit for your wastewater discharge would be a difficult process <br /> due to the wasteload allocations which must be completed to address the impairments. hi addition, <br /> Lathrop would probably be required to significantly upgrade the treatment provided. <br /> Mr. Gary Litton requested criteria that could be used in evaluating alternate locations for wastewater <br /> evaporation/percolation ponds, especially with regard to discharge of"renovated groundwater"to <br /> surface water bodies. For permitting purposes, the discharge of water will be considered wastewater if it <br /> contains statistically significant concentrations of wastewater constituents. All wastewater constituents, <br /> California Environmental Protection Agency <br /> Co Recycled Paper <br />