Laserfiche WebLink
' Cary Keaten - 3 - 10 April 2007 <br /> 5. In "Section D. Well Development," the section refers to "disposal fields," but the WDRs <br /> do not reference disposal fields. In general, it is preferable for waste to be applied to <br /> ' established land application areas. Depending on the amount of well development <br /> water generated, it may require the waste to be trucked to a land application area. <br /> However, if the well development/purge water infiltrates the local area, discharge at the <br /> ' well site may be acceptable. Discharge of development or purge water to a stormwater <br /> drain feature is not acceptable. Please address the waste disposal methods and avoid <br /> using terms that are not defined in the WDRs. <br /> ' 6. In "Section E. Well Survey," survey companies are listed by name. We suggest you <br /> include the phase, "Or similarly qualified land survey consultants that are licensed by <br /> ' the State of California." <br /> 7. In "Section F. Monitoring Well Destruction," please address the following items: <br /> ' a. The section fails to state that the work shall be performed under the supervision of <br /> a California licensed engineer or geologist. <br /> ' b. As required by WDRs Provision G.1.i.ii I., Groundwater Well Project Description <br /> Addendums are required prior to any groundwater monitoring well destruction <br /> workplan. <br /> c. The section only discusses one method of well destruction. We agree that over- <br /> drilling a well is the preferred method of well destruction, but there may be cases <br /> where other well destruction methods are appropriate or required by site <br /> ' constraints. Please update the discussion of well destruction with other potentially <br /> acceptable methods of well destruction. <br /> ' 8. In "Section G. Reporting," please include a reference to, and the Master Workplan <br /> should include a copy of, WDRs Attachment F, Requirements for Monitoring Well <br /> Installation Workplan and Monitoring Well Installation Reports. <br /> 9. In "Section I. Groundwater Sampling and Analysis Plan," please address the following <br /> items: <br /> a. As presented in the Master Workplan the discussion of the chemical analyses and <br /> the lack of discussion of the defined groundwater monitoring network is likely to <br /> result in confusion. Please address the following items: <br /> ' i. Established Monitoring Well Network - There is no distinction between <br /> groundwater monitoring wells that will be sampled for water level only and <br /> ' wells that will be sampled for water level/water quality. The monitoring well <br /> network for the currently allowed flow rate of 750,000 gallons per day is <br /> defined in Finding No. 62 of WDRs Order No. R5-2006-0094. Please add a <br /> ' discussion of the current monitoring requirements and how they may change <br /> with approval of future Recycled Water Expansion Reports. <br /> ii. List of Chemical Analyses - The Master Workplan includes substantially more <br /> ' analytes than required by the Monitoring and Reporting Program (MRP). <br /> Your may perform these additional analyses, but must submit the data with <br /> the required monitoring data. To clarify the minimum required monitoring, <br /> please add clarifying text to the section and a column to Table 2 that <br /> identifies analyses required by the MRP. <br /> ' WI UWA--nSui6 MGDV.n BMu 07.dog <br />