Laserfiche WebLink
September 30, 1999 <br /> 47491 1 Harding Lawson Associates <br /> Margaret Lagono, Supervising REHS <br />' San Joaquin County Public Health Services <br /> Environmental Health Division <br /> Page 3 <br />' the remaining impacted sods do not contain the COCs associated with# six fuel that would typically <br /> pose a potential threat to health or safety <br />' • The soluble data from the courtyard samples, and the additional soluble data from the six UST-removal <br /> samples, indicate that the impacted soils remaining on site do not pose a threat to groundwater quality <br />' • The risk based corrective action (RBCA) assessment shows that the Site does not pose a threat to <br /> human health or safety <br /> 210,000-gallon UST Removal Project <br /> A detailed discussion of UST removal activities was presented in HLA's December 22, 1999 report entitled <br />' Closure Report, 210,000-gallon UST Removal Project The following is a brief summary of the investigation, <br /> and its results and conclusions The Number 6 fuel UST was located in the southeast corner of the Site (Plate <br /> 2) The UST was cylindrical in shape, approximately 70 feet in diameter, constructed of reinforced concrete <br />' sidewalls and bottom that was approximately 7 25 feet bgs The closure of this UST was by complete removal <br /> of the concrete sides and bottom of the UST <br /> Removal activities were performed between June 15 and July 27, 1998, under the direction of HLA, in <br /> accordance with the June 15, 1998 UST Removal Permit issued by PHS/EHD On July 9, 1998 during <br /> removal activities, a nm of impacted soil was encountered and staff from PHS/EHD indicated that a work plan <br /> for over-excavation must be approved by the PHS/EHD Site Mitigation group prior any over-excavation <br /> HLA's work plan (BLA, 1998a)was approved and two phases of over-excavation and confirmation sampling <br /> were performed, with two areas of impacted soil remaining in place Based on the findings of the removal <br /> activities,HLA presented conclusions that included amongst others the following <br /> Impacted soils were restricted to a narrow rim located adjacent and outside of the concrete sidewalls of <br />' the UST and these impacted soils were excavated and stockpiled temporarily for chemical profiling <br /> prior to offsite disposal <br /> • Impacted soils were properly transported by Don Beste Transportation Inc , a state-registered hauler, <br /> and disposed of at Altamont Landfill, a licensed TSD facility in Altamont, California <br /> • The excavation was appropriately backfilled and compacted <br />' • Impacted soils remain in place on the northwest and northeast sides of the excavation <br /> • The lateral and vertical extent of the soils have been determined <br />' • The remaining impacted soils do not contain detectable concentrations of BTEX <br /> • Soluble analyses indicate that these soils do not contain detectable concentrations of soluble TPHd or <br /> TPHmo, and therefore do not pose a potential threat to groundwater quality <br /> Following the completion of the UST removal project, quarterly groundwater monitoring of the four wells <br /> around the UST was performed for two additional quarters Quarterly monitoring was performed on July 28, <br /> 1998, a few days after removal activities, and on October 14, 1998, approximately 3 months after removal <br />' r, <br />