Laserfiche WebLink
September 30, 1999 <br /> 47491 1 Harding Lawson Associates <br /> Margaret Lagono, Supervising REHS <br /> San Joaquin County Public Health Services <br /> Environmental Health Division <br /> Page 2 <br /> sump located within the courtyard of main plant building (Plate 2) The second area consisted of a 210,000- <br /> gallon Number 6 UST located in the southeast corner of the Newark facility(Plate 2) For a detailed <br />' presentation of the sites history and the results of these investigations, the reader is referred to HLA's reports <br /> entitled Closure Report, 210,000-gallon UST Removal Project, and Summary Report, Limited Phase 11 <br /> Investigation, Courtyard Tanks and Sump, both dated December 22, 1998 (HLA 1998b and 1998c) <br /> Presented below is a brief synopsis of previous work in the courtyard and a brief summary of HLA's <br /> investigations in both areas <br /> Courtyard Tanks and Sump <br /> In October 1990, American Environmental Management Corporation (AEMC) submitted a report(AEMC, <br />' 1990)titled "Unauthorized Release Report for Newark Paperboard Corporation, Stockton, California " The <br /> report summarized results of July 1990 soil sampling and recommended closure procedures for the No 6 fuel <br /> delivery pipeline and the courtyard tanks (concrete vaults) and sump <br />' In October/November 1993, the courtyard tanks and sump were closed in-place by Resna Industries Inc <br /> (RESNA) by removing the remaining contents, cleaning, and backfilling with a cement slurry (RESNA, 1994) <br /> This work was presented in RESNA'S report entitled Underground Fuel Storage Tank Closure, dated July 12, <br /> 1994 <br /> In September 1997, PHS/EHD correspondence to Newark requested further investigation of the extent of <br />' petroleum hydrocarbons in the courtyard area In April 1998, in accordance with the approved work plan, <br /> HLA conducted a field investigation and prepared a summary report entitled Limned Phase II investigation, <br /> Courtyard Tanks and Sump, dated December 22, 1998 (HLA 1998c) The scope of work for the investigation <br />' was developed after discussions with Ms Lagorio of PHS/EHD The objectives of the investigation were to <br /> assess the maximum concentrations and lateral and vertical distribution of petroleum hydrocarbon-impacted <br /> soil A further objective of the investigation was to assess the potential threat to groundwater quality and to <br /> assess the feasibility of insitu passive bioremediation of impacted sods Based on the results of this and <br /> previous investigations,HLA concluded the following <br />' • Potential leaks have been eliminated by closure activities which removed all former product, cleaned, <br /> and backfilled the USTs/sump with concrete <br /> • The lateral extent of the impacted soil associated with the courtyard USTs/sump location has been <br /> determined <br /> • The vertical extent of impacted soil has been determined and does not extend to depths of 20 feet bgs at <br />' the source <br /> • The areal extent of impacted soil is less than 700 square feet <br /> 1 • The Hydropunch groundwater data are suspect and groundwater is not likely to be impacted based on <br /> • the available data <br />' • The lack of detectable benzene in all soil samples collected to date and the lack of detectable <br /> polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in the soil with the maximum TPH concentrations indicates that <br />