Laserfiche WebLink
r <br /> 16- December 22, 1998 Harding Lawson Associates <br /> 4034405 <br /> Margaret Lagorio, Supervising REHS <br /> San Joaquin County Public Health Services <br /> Environmental Health Division <br />' Page 2 <br /> The Site is lust south of industrial facilities in the Port of Stockton and surrounding land use is mainly <br /> industrial with minor residential areas Interstate 5 is located lust east of the Site <br /> Hydrogoologic Framework <br /> The nearest major surface water body is the San Joaquin River at the Stockton Deepwater Channel and <br /> Turning Basin, located approximately 0 75 miles north of the Site According to regional groundwater <br /> maps compiled in spring of 1996 by the San Joaquin County Flood Control and Water Conservation <br /> District (SJCFC/WCD) the depth to groundwater beneath the Site is 15 to 20 feet below ground surface <br /> 1 (bgs) (SJCFC/WCD, 1996) The groundwater beneath the Site vicinity flows toward the east (SJCFC/WCD, <br /> 1996) Four onsite monitoring wells, associated with the former# 6 fuel oil UST, are located <br /> approximately 500 feet southeast of the courtyard in the southeast corner of the Site Groundwater level <br /> measurements during the last two years indicate that groundwater depths have ranged from 6 to 20 feet <br /> bgs and the flow directions have varied from the northeast through the southeast <br /> BACKGROUND <br /> In October 1990,American Environmental Management Corporation (AEMC) submitted a report (AEMC, <br /> 1990) titled "Unauthorized Release Report for Newark Paperboard Corporation, Stockton, California " The <br /> report summarized results of July 1990 soil sampling and recommended closure procedures for the No 6 <br /> fuel delivery pipeline and the courtyard tanks (concrete vaults) and sump (concrete) Three angled soil <br /> borings were drilled in the vicinity of the courtyard tanks and sump designated NSA-1, NSA-2 and NSA-3 <br /> The locations of these borings are shown on Plate 3 Two soil samples were collected from each borehole <br /> The borings were drilled to an approximate depth of 20 feet (borehole depth) below giound surface (bgs) <br /> Samples collected from approximate 10 and 20 feet within the borings were submitted from each boring <br /> for chemical analyses <br /> Samples were analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons, quantified against a diesel standard (TPHd), <br /> total recoverable petroleum hydrocarbons (TRPH), and benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and total xylenes <br /> (BTEX) No BTEX was reported TPHd was only detected in the shallow samples from NSA-1 and NSA 2, <br /> with a maximum concentration of 730 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) found in NSA-2 TRPH was <br /> detected in each sample, with concentrations ranging between 110 and 13,000 mg/kg, with the exception <br /> of the deeper sample (20 5 feet bgs) from NSA-3 <br /> In October/November 1993, the courtyard tanks and sump were closed in-place by Resna Industries Inc <br /> (RESNA)by removing the remaining contents, cleaning, and backfilling with a cement slurry (RESNA, <br />' 1994) Prior to backfilling, soil samples were collected through the bottom of the tanks and sump through <br /> holes placed in the concrete bottoms A total of six soil samples were collected and submitted for TPHd <br /> and BTEX TPHd was found to be present in low to moderate concentrations in all but one of the samples <br /> collected from beneath the tanks and sump The highest recorded concentration of TPHd (600 mglkg) <br /> was detected at the eastern end of the sump This sample was also analyzed for soluble TPH as gasoline <br /> TPHg, TPHd, and BTEX Leachable TPHd was reported in the extract at 1 3 milligrams per liter (mg/L) It <br /> is not known if the laboratory used deionized water or an acid for this analyses <br /> No groundwater was encountered diiiing these activities <br />