Laserfiche WebLink
December 22, 1998 Harding Lawson Associates <br /> 4034405 <br /> Margaret Lagorio, Supervising RENS <br /> San Joaquin County Public Health Services <br /> Environmental Health Division <br /> Page 3 <br /> FIELD INVESTIGATION <br /> The scope of work was developed after discussions with Ms Margaret Lagorio of PHS/EHD Boring <br /> permits were issued by PHS/EHD on February 12, 1998 The objectives of the investigation included the <br /> following <br /> • Assess further the lateral and vertical distribution of petroleum hydrocarbon-impacted soil <br /> • The purpose of boring SB-1 was to assess the maximum concentrations of TPH-impacted soil and the <br /> vertical extent of impacted soils near the source <br /> 1 • The purpose of boring SB-2 was to assess the lateral extent of impacted soil to the east of the <br /> USTs/sump location <br /> • Assess whether impacted soils present pose a potential threat to groundwater quality by collecting <br /> data on the soluble fractions of TPHd and BTEX present in soils with the maximum concentrations of <br /> petroleum hydrocarbons <br /> • If groundwater was encountered during drilling collect a grab sample with a Hydropunch sampling <br /> tool <br /> • Assess the feasibility of insitu passive bioremediation of impacted soils <br /> Prior to commencement of work, a site specific Health and Safety Plan (HSP) (HLA, 1998) was prepared <br /> that was consistent with the requirements of Title 8 CCR 5192 During all field work, procedures outlined <br /> in the HSP were followed Prior to onsite sampling activities, Underground Service Alert (USA) was <br /> notified to mark existing utilities present at the site, and a private utility locator surveyed the drilling <br /> locations and marked additional subsurface utilities <br /> Soil Borings and Soil Sampling <br /> On April 28, 1998 two soil borings (SB-1 and 513-2) were drilled to depths of 20 5 feet bgs at the locations <br /> shown on Plate 3 Boring S13-1 was moved approximately thiee feet from its proposed location due to the <br /> presence of a subsurface utility line and was drilled as close as possible to the sump to assess the <br /> 1 maximum concentrations and vertical extent of impacted soil at the former source area Boring SB-2 was <br /> drilled east of the USTs/sump location to assess the lateral extent of impacted sail All borings were <br /> drilled with skid-mounted Diedrich D-25 drill rig equipped with four-inch diameter, solid-stem augers and <br /> I operated by PC Exploration Incorporated, a C-57-licensed driller fiom Roseville, California Soil samples <br /> were collected at minimum 5-foot inteivals for lithographic description, volatile organic compound (VOC) <br /> screening, and potential laboratory(chemical) analysis The samples were collected using a 2 0 inch <br /> (inside diameter) California Modified split-spoon sampler lined with thiee clean 6-inch long brass tubes <br /> The sampler was driven with a 140-pound hammer The number of blows required to drive the sampler <br /> each six-inch interval was recorded and used as a qualitative measure of soil density <br /> The lowermost tube from each sample interval was removed from the sampler and immediately capped <br /> with Teflon-lined plastic end caps, labeled, and placed in an ice-chilled cooler for transport to a state- <br /> certified analytical laboratory Samples were recorded on a standard HLA chain-of-custody form to <br /> document sample identification and handling The remaining sod sample from each interval was checked <br /> for hydrocarbon stains and monitored for VOC vapors using a photoionization detector (PID) to indicate <br /> the relative concentrations of volatile compounds The PID was equipped with a 10 2 electron-volt lamp <br /> • and calibrated to a 100 pait per million (ppm) isobutylene standard <br />