Laserfiche WebLink
i rk <br /> 24 October 1997 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 96-0235 <br /> Page 2 of 1 i <br /> performing a ground water monitoring event <br /> r S <br />' 4.0. PREVIOUS GROUND WATER MONITORING RESULTS <br /> The following discussion was compiled from reports prepared by Kleinfelder, Inc (KI), including <br />' Soil and Groundwater Assessment Report, dated 11 November 1994, ground water monitoring <br /> reports dated 03 January 1995, 18 May 1995, 14 December 1995, and 08 May 1996, and one <br /> undated data table Figure 3 = Ground Water Elevation - 04 April 1994 illustrates the ground water <br />' flow direction for the Kleinfelder monitoring event of 04 April 1994 Insufficient data was provided <br /> in other available reports to reconstruct ground water elevation maps for previous monitoring events <br />' Monitoring wells MW-1 and MW-2, screened between depths of approximately 40 to 60 feet bsg, <br /> are `drowned' wells since as late as April 1994 the surface of the ground water table has risen well <br /> above the tops of the screened intervals Monitoring well MW-3, with a screened interval of <br /> approximately 30 to 55 feet bsg, has had ground water above the screened interval since October <br /> 1995 The highest concentrations of TPH-g and volatile aromatics (benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene <br /> and xylenes BTE&X) in soil samples collected during well installations were encountered in MW-2 <br /> at a depth of 41 5 feet bsg, TPH-g was detected at 1,200 mg/kg and benzene was detected at 11 <br /> mg/kg , <br /> TPH-g concentrations encountered In ground water samples collected from the three wells during <br /> these monitoring events were as high as 35,000 parts per billion (ppb, reported as micrograms per <br />' liter), and may have been'higher as samples having gasoline-like odor were not analyzed Benzene <br /> concentrations were as high as 2,100 ppb, toluene as high as 4,200 ppb, ethylbenzene as high as <br /> 1,000 ppb, and xylenes as high as 3,500 ppb Despite being a `drowned' well, MW-2 appeared to <br />' be the most intensely impacted Table 1 presents the analytical data from these ground water <br /> monitoring events <br /> 1 <br /> 5 0. STOCKPILED SOIL SAMPLING <br /> Excavated soil from the former UST over-excavation was stockpiled on site to aerate On 25 June <br /> 1996 and 08 November 1996, AGE sampled the stockpiled soil Sampling methods and analytical <br />' results are presented below - <br /> 51 PROCEDURES <br /> On 25 June 1996, an AGE representative collected eleven soil samples from various locations on the <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc' <br />