My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0012864
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WILSON
>
4105
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0524283
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0012864
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/20/2019 10:38:56 AM
Creation date
6/20/2019 10:33:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0012864
RECORD_ID
PR0524283
PE
2959
FACILITY_ID
FA0016289
FACILITY_NAME
LEGACY DEVELOPMENT INC
STREET_NUMBER
4105
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
WILSON
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
13202014
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
4105 N WILSON WAY
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Stockton 99 Speedway <br /> Quality Assurance Project Plan April 12,2007 <br /> r Functional Guidelines for Inorganic Data Review (USEPA, 2002b). These guidance documents provide <br /> specific data validation criteria that can be applied to the data type generated for this project. Some data <br /> acquisition requirements may be less stringent; however, compliance in the quality control areas <br /> described in Section 3 will assure useful data are obtained during any given sampling event. <br /> The laboratory data will be reviewed for compliance with the applicable method and the quality of the <br /> data reported. The following summarizes the areas of data validation. <br /> a Data Completeness; <br /> • Holding Times; <br /> • Blanks; <br /> • Laboratory Control Samples; <br /> • Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicates; <br /> • Surrogates/Internal Standards (as applicable); <br /> Field Quality Control Samples; and <br /> • Compound Identification and Quantification. <br /> The application of data validation criteria is a function of project-specific DQOs. SGI's QA Manager will <br /> assess the overall quality of the analytical data. Results of the data validation review will be documented <br /> and summarized in.the respective report of data. All resulting documentation will be maintained in the <br /> project files. <br /> E <br /> 9.4 Data Qualifiers <br /> The data validation procedures were designed to review each data set and identify biases inherent to the <br /> data and determine its usefulness. Data validation flags may be applied to those sample results that fall <br /> outside of specified tolerance limits, and, therefore, did not meet the program's quality assurance <br /> objectives described in Section 3.3. If warranted, data validation flags to be used for this project are <br /> defined in the National Functional Guidelines (USEPA, 1999, 2002b). Data validation flags will indicate if <br /> results are considered anomalous, estimated, or rejected. Only rejected data are considered unusable <br />' for decision-making purposes; however, other qualified data may require further verification. <br /> E <br /> 9.5 Reconciliation with DQOs <br /> All data will be reconciled with the data quality criteria for the laboratory analysis set forth in this QAPP. <br /> As described in the above sections, all validation will be documented in an appropriate manner and data <br /> qualified to indicate when criteria are exceeded. Data not useful for inclusion in Site evaluations will be <br /> I °uaidy_.��,�Pro; -P�eRF,al.doc 9-2 The Source Group,Inc. <br /> f <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.