Laserfiche WebLink
Stockton 99 Speedway <br /> Quality Assurance Project Plan April 12,2007 <br /> r Functional Guidelines for Inorganic Data Review (USEPA, 2002b). These guidance documents provide <br /> specific data validation criteria that can be applied to the data type generated for this project. Some data <br /> acquisition requirements may be less stringent; however, compliance in the quality control areas <br /> described in Section 3 will assure useful data are obtained during any given sampling event. <br /> The laboratory data will be reviewed for compliance with the applicable method and the quality of the <br /> data reported. The following summarizes the areas of data validation. <br /> a Data Completeness; <br /> • Holding Times; <br /> • Blanks; <br /> • Laboratory Control Samples; <br /> • Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicates; <br /> • Surrogates/Internal Standards (as applicable); <br /> Field Quality Control Samples; and <br /> • Compound Identification and Quantification. <br /> The application of data validation criteria is a function of project-specific DQOs. SGI's QA Manager will <br /> assess the overall quality of the analytical data. Results of the data validation review will be documented <br /> and summarized in.the respective report of data. All resulting documentation will be maintained in the <br /> project files. <br /> E <br /> 9.4 Data Qualifiers <br /> The data validation procedures were designed to review each data set and identify biases inherent to the <br /> data and determine its usefulness. Data validation flags may be applied to those sample results that fall <br /> outside of specified tolerance limits, and, therefore, did not meet the program's quality assurance <br /> objectives described in Section 3.3. If warranted, data validation flags to be used for this project are <br /> defined in the National Functional Guidelines (USEPA, 1999, 2002b). Data validation flags will indicate if <br /> results are considered anomalous, estimated, or rejected. Only rejected data are considered unusable <br />' for decision-making purposes; however, other qualified data may require further verification. <br /> E <br /> 9.5 Reconciliation with DQOs <br /> All data will be reconciled with the data quality criteria for the laboratory analysis set forth in this QAPP. <br /> As described in the above sections, all validation will be documented in an appropriate manner and data <br /> qualified to indicate when criteria are exceeded. Data not useful for inclusion in Site evaluations will be <br /> I °uaidy_.��,�Pro; -P�eRF,al.doc 9-2 The Source Group,Inc. <br /> f <br />