My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE FILE 1
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
COUNTRY CLUB
>
1403
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0505513
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE FILE 1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/20/2019 3:54:28 PM
Creation date
6/20/2019 2:49:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
FILE 1
RECORD_ID
PR0505513
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0006438
FACILITY_NAME
United # 5446
STREET_NUMBER
1403
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
COUNTRY CLUB
STREET_TYPE
BLVD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95204
APN
12323246
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1403 W COUNTRY CLUB BLVD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
170
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr.Michael Infurna <br /> October 30, 1996 <br /> Page 3 <br /> 1992 Vapor Extraction Testing <br /> Based on the results of groundwater monitoring activities, we have concluded that the <br /> installation of a vapor extraction remediation system is not necessary or warranted. Our <br /> rational is as follows: <br /> • the leak has been stopped and ongoing sources, including free product, have been <br /> removed or remediated; <br /> • the site has been adequately characterized; <br /> • the dissolved hydrocarbon plume is not migrating; <br /> • no water wells, deeper drinking water aquifers, surface water, or other sensitive <br /> receptors are likely to be impacted; <br /> • the site presents no significant threat to human health; and, <br /> • the site presents no significant risk to the environment. <br /> Taken in aggregate, I believe that the data supports a determination of"no further action" <br /> and a letter of case closure. <br /> MTBE detected in MW-6 <br /> We noted that MTBE was first detected at a concentration of 6.7 ug/1 during the October <br /> 1995 sampling event, and that concentrations of 2,700 ug/l and 4,100 ug/L were reported <br /> during the April 1996 sampling event. BP sold this site to the Tosco on August 1, 1994. <br /> We presume that any releases occurring after the sale would be the responsibility of the <br /> current owner/operator to address. If the concentrations of MTBE during the next <br /> quarter are lower that the results reported during the April 1996 sampling event, the <br /> occurrence of a subsequent release may be moot, provided that the chemical data further <br /> supports a finding for"no further action and case closure". <br /> San Joaquin County Deputy District Attorney <br /> It is unclear to me why"stricter guidelines" must be maintained now that a closure <br /> request is pending, and would like an explanation. I did not understand what was meant <br /> in your letter by"Current PHS-EHD policy requires that preparations for formal actions <br /> be copied to the DA so that an enforcement action file can be started in the event it is <br /> needed in the future." Please provide a copy of the policy you are referring to. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.