Laserfiche WebLink
PUBLIC HtALTH SERVICtS <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION ` <br /> Karen Furst, M.D., M.P.H., Health Officer <br /> 304 East Weber Avenue, Third Floor • Stockton, CA 95202 <br /> 209/468-3420 <br /> NOV 0 2 2000 <br /> DAVID J CAMILLE SCOTT T HOOTON <br /> TOSCO MARKETING COMPANY BP OIL COMPANY <br /> 2000 CROW CANYON PLACE STE 400 295 41 ST SW <br /> SAN RAMON CA 94583 RENTON WA 98055 <br /> RE: TOSCO/BP Service Station# 11192 SITE CODE: 1995123 <br /> 1403 Country Club Blvd. RO#:0000087 <br /> Stockton,C.A.,95204 <br /> San Joaquin County Public Health Services,Environmental Health Division(PHS-EHD) has reviewed the <br /> "Proposed Groundwater Purging and Disposal at Tosco (former BP Oil# 11192)" dated October 17,2000 as <br /> submitted by Gettler-Ryan Inc (GRI) on October 20,2000 and has the following comments. <br /> This proposal is a response by GRI to PHS-EHD October 3,2000 correspondence that required clarification <br /> to the intent and specifics of the"pump and disposal' of petroleum contaminated groundwater at the above <br /> referenced site. <br /> This most recent proposal has clarified the intent of this proposed action as an"interim remedial action" and <br /> established the duration for six-months on a weekly groundwater extraction of 5,000 gallons from monitoring <br /> well#3. PHS-EHD has not directed Tosco/BP to conduct an interim redial action,but due to recent rises in <br /> the MtBE in all monitoring wells onsite,this proposal complies with acceptable methods to reduce the mass <br /> and migration of the contaminant. <br /> Under Step 3 within the SWRCB Guiddires for lnzestigationand Cora p cfMtBE and other Oxygenates (Guidelines) <br /> final draft dated 30 March 2000,sites with persistent concentrations of MtBE over 10,000 ppb should have <br /> those concentrations and mass reduced before the plume can spread. But the Guidelines report does not <br /> specify the method or duration of the remedial action,nor does it specify a recommended volume for the <br /> method you have chosen. <br /> In addition,the Guidelines report emphasizes the importance of identifying the source of the MtBE release in <br /> the subsurface. Tosco/BP have made no mention of the status of their investigation as to the potential <br /> source of the increasing groundwater MtBE contamination since July 1998. MtBE groundwater <br /> concentrations in MW-7 were at 200 ppb until July 1998. Subsequent quarterly monitoring and sampling <br /> events indicate increasingly elevated concentrations of MtBE in both MW-7 and MW-3. The most recent <br /> sampling event submitted to PHS-EHD for the event held on July 14,2000 indicates that MW-3 has MtBE at <br /> 120,000 ppb and MW-7 has MtBE at 55,000 ppb. <br /> MtBE has been detected in all of the monitoring wells since mid to late July 1995,with the exception of MW- <br /> 5. Until it can be determined that your proposal to pump and dispose of MtBE contaminated groundwater is <br /> effective in reducing the contaminant mass,PHS-EHD imposes the following conditions on the proposal. <br /> 1) The weekly pumping of 5,000 gallons from MW-3 is approved,but for only two(2) month <br /> instead of the six requested. Brief reports/status updates which contain EPA Method 8260B <br /> analytical data for MtBE in the pre-pumped and post-pumped MW-3,as well as pumping rates and <br /> disposal records for the groundwater are to be submitted to PHS-EHD weekly. <br /> A Division of San Joaquin County Health Care Services <br />