Laserfiche WebLink
J6. . ....... <br /> *too <br /> CA <br /> San Joaquin County <br /> DIRECTOR <br /> Environmental Health Department Donna Heran,REHS <br /> 600 East Main Street <br /> UX P <br /> ROGRAM COORDINA'r <br /> X Stockton, California 95202-3029 Robert McClellon,REBS <br /> ORS <br /> Jeff Carruesco,RENS,RDI <br /> Iffiebsite. www.sJgov.or0hd Kasey Foley,RENS <br /> Linda Turkatte,REHS <br /> Phone: (209)468-3420 <br /> Fax: (209)464-0138 <br /> January 18, 2011 <br /> Mr. John Russell, PG, Fund Manager <br /> State Water Resources Control Board <br /> Division of Financial Assistance <br /> 1001 1 Street <br /> Sacramento, CA 95814 <br /> SUBJECT: COMMENTS ON CLEANUP FUND SITE CLOSURE RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> Dear Mr. Russell: <br /> On 24 December 2010, the San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department (EHD) <br /> received your letter requesting comments on the closure of 18 sites in the EHD Local Oversight <br /> Program (LOP) for which your office, the State Water Resources Control Board Cleanup Fund <br /> (CUF), has made closure consideration recommendation. Of the 18 sites: <br /> • Six sites are in the final closure process. An EHD decision to close the sites was made <br /> with no additional data, analysis or technical justifications required (Claim Nos. 13651, <br /> 13879, 14118, 15890, 17042 and 16496). Depending on the consultants timing for <br /> destroying monitoring wells and submitting certification of proper disposal of <br /> investigation-derived wasted (IDW), the EHD anticipates issuing case closure letters <br /> within 90 days; <br /> • Nine sites have No Further Action Reports (NFAR) that are undergoing EHD review, <br /> human health risk assessments, or data evaluation. No additional site data acquisition <br /> anticipated except for soil gas data in a few cases (Claim Nos. 4423, 8431, 889, 1978, <br /> 11775, 13850, 17179, 1026 and 16139); <br /> • Two require some additional work, such as data evaluation, monitoring, delineation, <br /> remediation, or confirmation data(Claim Nos. 8753 and 14558); and <br /> • One site (Claim No. 14353) has been referred to the Central Valley Regional Water <br /> Quality Control Board(CVRWQCB). <br /> Your letter indicates that if the EHD agrees that a site should be closed, a closure letter will be <br /> issued within 90 days. The EHD agrees that the first six sites noted above will fit this criteria. <br /> While not disagreeing with you on the next nine sites, experience indicates that more than 90 <br /> days will be required to complete the closure process. EHD comments on each of the 18 sites, <br /> in the order given, are shown below: <br /> Comments on CUF Site Closure Recommendations 011 1,doc <br />