Laserfiche WebLink
FIRST QUARTER REPORT <br /> KWIKEE FOODS <br /> 2081 Country Club Boulevard <br /> Stockton, California <br /> February 26, 1999 <br /> EXECU'T`IVE SUMMARY <br /> Groundwater monitoring at the Kwikee Food site took place on January 28, 1999. The depth to <br /> groundwater in the three monitoring wells was measured with a Solinst water level meter, and a <br /> battery-operated purge pump was used to purge the wells of standing water. Fourty-five gallons of <br /> water were removed from the wells and stored in a DOT-approved drum on site. After purging, <br /> water samples were collected in glass vials and transported to the laboratory and were analyzed for <br /> Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as gasoline and BTEX_ <br /> As in May 1998, the present groundwater gradient is southwest, at 0.025 ft/ft. This is in contrast <br /> to an east or northeast gradient, which is the more typical pattern. The present gradient <br /> demonstrates that the southwest gradient in May 1998 was not a fluke, but was due to Subsurface <br /> conditions that apparently prevail only during part of the year. This alternating southwest and <br /> northeast flow presumably creates a "sloshing" effect on gasoline hydrocarbons in the aquifer, <br /> preventing the contaminants from consistently migrating in one direction away from the. site. <br /> As in the past, hydrocarbons were detected in all wells, but at concentrations similar to Vose in the <br /> past two monitoring events rather than at the much higher concentrations that were commonplace <br /> prior to 1998. This sharp decline in concentrations may be the result of the removal in March 1998 <br /> of the two USTs that were formerly present, but it is also possible that the reduction is Niue to the <br /> exceptionally high water table that has existed for over a year. Because of the high wate'- table, the <br /> screened interval in all three wells is several feet below the soil-groundwater inteiface. It is <br /> therefore too early to conclude that the decrease in concentrations is real; additional monitoring, <br /> probably supplemented with additional monitoring wells, will be required before a clear picture of <br /> contaminant behavior can be developed at this site. <br /> f <br />