Laserfiche WebLink
zge 4, K%ikee, 1/15/95 <br /> 4.3 Groundwater Gradient <br /> Based on the data obtained December 28, groundwater gradient appears to flow in an easterly <br /> direction(Figure 3) at a gradient of about 0.1 feet per 100 feet(0.1%) <br /> 4.4, ZvldcnCe of SOK 'ntamination, <br /> Slight hydrocarbon odors were noted in soil samples at 10, 15, and 20 feet in KF-1. PID readings <br /> of 85 and 38 ppm were measured in the latter two samples, and a reading of 88 ppm was recorded <br /> from a grab sample at 30 feet. No odors were present in samples from ICF-2, but a PID reading of <br /> 10 ppm was measured in the sample at 20 feet. <br /> Laboratory results are presented in Appendix B and summarized in Table 3. Total petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPH-g) were not detected above reporting limits in any of the soil <br /> samples, although low peaks were observed in three samples. Volatile aromatic hydrocarbons were <br /> detected in four of the six samples at concentrations at or near the detection limits. <br /> A strong gasoline odor was present in KF-3 when it was purged and sampled, and a moderate <br /> odor was noted in KF-1. Elevated concentrations of all target analytes (except total lead) were <br /> detected during laboratory analysis of water samples from bath wells (Table 2 and Appendix B). <br /> No odor was evident in ICF-2, although all analytes were detected above the minimum detection <br /> limits. The highest concentrations were present in ICF-3, which is consistent with the strong odors <br /> present in this well and its Iocation closest to both the tank facility and the adjacent Chevron site. <br /> 5.0 DATA AINA11II S <br /> 5.1 IExtemt off Sail Comte=—.nnt.*On <br /> The absence of detectable TPH-g and the low concentrations of BTEX in soil samples imply that <br /> no major soil contamination was encountered during this investigation. The available data suggest <br /> that soil contamination is not extensive at this site. Rather than vadose-zone percolation from a <br /> leaking tank, the detected aromatics may have been adsorbed on soil particles from <br /> contaminated groundwater during seasonal fluctuations in groundwater level. <br /> 5.2 ZO meet off Groundwater Contnmanjation <br /> Contaminated groundwater is evidently present beyond the portion of the site studied in this <br /> investigation. The elevated concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons in KF-1 imply that <br /> groundwater contamination probably extends off site beneath the residential property to the north. <br /> Groundwater is also likely to be contaminated beneath the Kwikee Foods building. The <br />