My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE FILE 3
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
COUNTRY CLUB
>
2705
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544595
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE FILE 3
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/24/2019 10:55:23 AM
Creation date
6/24/2019 10:04:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
FILE 3
RECORD_ID
PR0544595
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0002048
FACILITY_NAME
TESORO (Shell) 68221(WRR 6290)
STREET_NUMBER
2705
STREET_NAME
COUNTRY CLUB
STREET_TYPE
BLVD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95204
APN
12121008
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
2705 COUNTRY CLUB BLVD
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
003
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
112
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DISCUSSION: <br /> LUpper Water Bearino Zone <br /> Depth to groundwater in the monitoring wells ranged from 6.08 to 8.95 feet below the top of the well <br /> casing and were within historical groundwater elevation fluctuation ranges. Depth-to-water <br /> measurements were converted to feet above mean sea level (MSL)and used to construct a groundwater <br /> elevation contour map(Figure 2). Southeastern groundwater flow was generally noted, at low gradients <br /> ranging from about 0.001 to 0.002 ft/ft. Variable, northeast, and southeast groundwater flow directions <br /> have generally been reported during previous monitoring events. <br /> GRO was only detected in samples collected from two offsite wells(MW-8 and MW-15, at concentrations <br /> of 340 gg/L and 130 gg/L, respectively). Benzene was only detected in one onsite well (MW-20, at 11 <br /> L gg/L). MTBE generally impacts the eastern portion of the site and offsite areas to the east and <br /> southeast. The highest MTBE concentrations were reported in offsite wells MW-8(440µg/L)and MW-15 <br /> (160 µg/L). MTBE concentrations in the other groundwater monitoring wells were relatively low(at and <br /> below 50 gg/L). TBA was not detected in any of the well samples collected during the second quarter <br /> 2010. Analytical results of GRO, benzene, MTBE, and TBA for groundwater samples collected from the <br /> shallow screened wells during the second quarter 2010 are presented in Figure 4. <br /> Lower Water Bearing Zone <br /> Depth to groundwater in the monitoring wells ranged from 7.12 to 8.42 feet below the top of the well <br /> casing and were within historical groundwater elevation fluctuation ranges. Depth-to-water <br /> measurements were converted to feet above mean sea level (MSL)and used to construct a groundwater <br /> elevation contour map(Figure 3). Northeast groundwater flow, at an average gradient of approximately <br /> 0.002 ft/ft, was observed on June 10, 2010. Northeast and northwest groundwater flow directions have <br /> been reported during previous monitoring events. <br /> Petroleum hydrocarbon and fuel oxygenate impact to the lower water bearing interval appears negligible. <br /> Benzene was detected in the samples collected from wells MW-12 and MW-21, at concentrations of 0.53 <br /> gg/L and 0.61 pVL, respectively. Low levels of DRO were reported in one well sample, however the <br /> laboratory noted that this concentration included compounds uncharacteristic of common fuels and <br /> lubricants. Analytical results of GRO, benzene, MTBE, and TBA for groundwater samples collected from <br /> the deeper screened wells during the second quarter 2010 are presented in Figure 5. <br /> RECOMMENDATIONS: <br /> In early June 2010, SJCEHD and Stratus personnel discussed future management of the environmental <br /> case at the subject site. SJCEHD noted that groundwater monitoring has been ongoing for quite some <br /> time, and indicated that their agency was likely to make a decision in the upcoming months regarding <br /> future site requirements. Specifically, the possibility of moving the site towards case closure, requiring a <br /> Feasibility Study/Corrective Action Plan(FS/CAP)report, and possibly performing a soil gas survey were <br /> topics mentioned by SJCEHD. It was requested that Stratus provide a recommendation regarding a <br /> future site management strategy. <br /> Using the groundwater analytical data collected during the second quarter 2010, Stratus has prepared <br /> estimates regarding the remaining mass of GRO and MTBE, which appear to be the primary <br /> contaminants impacting shallow groundwater at the site. Computation sheets which document these <br /> contaminant mass estimations, and figures that accompany this data, are provided in Appendix E. <br /> Based on the available data, Stratus estimates that 0.74 pounds of GRO and 1.11 pounds of MTBE <br /> remain dissolved in groundwater at the site. <br /> Given the relatively low mass of dissolved contaminants beneath the site, and the absence of <br /> groundwater sensitive receptors previously documented in the sife vicinity, it is our opinion that active <br /> groundwater remedial measures are not justified. Recent analytical data shows a general declining trend <br /> in levels of petroleum hydrocarbons and fuel oxygenates without active remedial efforts being <br /> K USA Gaso1me\08350wtc1y\2010\USA_835 2Q10.D0C STIMTUS <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.