Laserfiche WebLink
CATC <br /> California Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) or below the EPA secondary standard (aesthetic) with <br /> the exception of total chromium(0.10 milligrams per liter[mg/1]) and hexavalent chromium(0.11 mg/1)in <br /> well MW-3. <br /> In order to assess the validity of the MW-3 results for chromium species, a verification round of sampling <br /> was performed in August of 1991 by WA. Water samples were collected from monitoring well MW-3 <br /> and Stocldon City supply wells WP-1 and WP-2. Each sample was analyzed for total and hexavalent <br /> chromium by Clayton Environmental Consultants. The results indicated both City wells were below <br /> method detection limits for total chromium (0.05 mg/1) and hexavalent chromium (0.01 mg/1). However, <br /> total and hexavalent chromium were detected in the water samples collected from MW-3. <br /> In October 1993, RESNA Industries Inc. (RESNA) attempted to evaluate the extent of chromium and <br /> hexavalent chromium in the soil in the vicinity of former Vault 8. Two soil borings, SB1 and SB2 <br /> were advanced north of the former Vault 8. The results indicated that the soil impact was limited to the <br /> area occupied by former Vault 8, encompassing approximately 450 square feet. It was concluded that <br /> the soil impact extended directly beneath the former vault to the water table. The findings and results <br /> were presented in RESNA's report titled Additional Soil Assessment Report and Fourth Quarter <br /> Monitoring Report, Underground Storage Vaults, dated January 1994. <br /> In November 2001 and January 2002, ATC advanced nine soil borings. Low concentrations of <br /> hexavalent chromium were detected in soil and groundwater samples collected during the investigation. <br /> The highest concentrations of hexavalent chromium in soil were detected in the samples collected from <br /> off-site boring S139. Hexavalent chromium concentrations at this location were well below the <br /> concentrations previously detected in soil boring B8-A, which was advanced beneath Vault 8. <br /> Hexavalent chromium was detected in groundwater at low concentrations in the samples collected from <br /> borings SB 1, SB2, SB3, SB4, SB5, and SB9. Concentrations ranged from 0.5 to 5.1 micrograms per <br /> liter (ug/1). The reported concentrations were below the MCL for total chromium of 50 ug/I and well <br /> below concentrations detected in monitoring well MW-3, which historically have been the highest <br /> detected levels at the site. These findings and results were presented in ATC's report titled Summary <br /> Report of Subsurface Investigation, dated February 2002. <br /> In September and October 2002, cone penetration testing (CPT) borings CPT1 and CPT2, Geoprobe <br /> (direct push) borings CPTla and CPT2a, and groundwater monitoring wells MW-4 through MW-8 <br /> were installed at the site. CPTI and CPT2 borings were advanced to 120 and 139 feet bgs, <br /> respectively, to provide continuous stratigraphic definition in the borings. Grab groundwater samples <br /> were collected from CPTla and CPT2a at depths of 109 and 114 feet bgs, respectively. Monitoring <br /> wells MW-4 through MW-8 were completed to a total depth of 65 feet bgs. Hexavalent chromium <br /> was not detected in soil samples collected from the boreholes of MW-4 through MW-8. Hexavalent <br /> chromium was detected in groundwater samples collected from wells MW-2 through MW-7 in <br /> September 2002, with the highest concentration detected at 4.0 mg/1 in the groundwater sample <br /> collected from well MW-3. Hexavalent chromium was detected at concentrations of 0.170 and 0.012 <br /> mg/I in grab groundwater samples collected from borings CPTla and CPT2a, respectively. These grab <br /> samples were collected from the deeper water-bearing zone.Total chromium was detected in the water <br /> samples collected from all the wells, including the facility well, with the highest concentration detected <br /> at 6.2 mg/l in the groundwater sample collected from MW-3. The grab groundwater samples collected <br /> from CPTla and CPT2a were not analyzed for total chromium. These findings and results were <br /> WA62583Veaers\Concept Design Outline.doc 2 <br />