My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE FILE 2
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
D
>
DURHAM FERRY
>
1600
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544624
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE FILE 2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/3/2019 6:16:25 PM
Creation date
7/3/2019 3:32:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
FILE 2
RECORD_ID
PR0544624
PE
3526
FACILITY_ID
FA0005206
FACILITY_NAME
GEORGES SERVICE
STREET_NUMBER
1600
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
DURHAM FERRY
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
APN
25510004
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1600 W DURHAM FERRY RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
215
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br /> Former George's Service Page 2 <br /> 1600 Durham Ferry Road August 22, 2014 <br /> Tracy, California 95376 <br /> • Observe soil samples for moisture content, and petroleum hydrocarbon contamination <br /> by noting soil discoloration and recording readings from a photo ionization detector <br /> (PID) used to detect petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations. <br /> The EHD and GZA have discussed GZA's proposals presented in the work plan during a <br /> telephone conversation on 04 August 2014. Consideration was given to the limited vadose <br /> zone since first groundwater is currently at approximately fourteen-and-a-half feet bsg. The <br /> EHD and GZA concluded that an AS/SVE pilot test should be performed and based on the <br /> findings, the pilot test may be followed by submittal of a Corrective Action Plan (CAP) by GZA. <br /> To this end, the EHD approves the installation of only one of the two proposed AS wells and <br /> only four of the eight proposed SVE wells. Specifically, the EHD approves the installation of <br /> the proposed AS and SVE wells that are clustered under the northern section of the building <br /> as illustrated on Figure 3 of the work plan. The EHD also approves the advancement of the <br /> three proposed soil borings for site assessment, collection of the proposed soil samples from <br /> the three borings, one AS and four SVE wells for lithologic and chemical analyses, and field <br /> observations as presented in the above-bulleted items. <br /> The EHD directs that an AS/SVE pilot study work plan be submitted to this agency by 17 <br /> October 2014 that defines the AS/SVE parameters to be collected and duration of the pilot <br /> test. Proceed with installing the one AS and four SVE wells and advancing the three soil <br /> borings. Submit a Well and Boring Permit Application, Licensed Contractors' Declaration <br /> (LCD) form, Master File Record (MFR) form, and appropriate permit/inspection fees to the <br /> EHD. Please note that the EHD fees have increased effective 01 August 2014. The permit <br /> fee for the installation of each well is $130; the total fee for all three borings is $130; and the <br /> Inspection/Activity fee is $390 per parcel. A fee of$1,170.00 ($130 x 5 + $130 + $390) will be <br /> required for the well installation and borings. <br /> In 15t Semi-Annual Groundwater Monitoring & Remedial Effectiveness 15t & 2"d Quarters 2014, <br /> dated 04 August 2014, GZA recommends performing "quarterly depth-to-water measurements <br /> from wells MW-101, MW-201, MW-107, MW-2x and MW-202 in order to calculate vertical <br /> groundwater gradients as requested in the SJCEHD letter dated June 4th, 2014." To clarify, by <br /> letter dated 04 June 2014, the EHD recommended dispensing with the time and effort to <br /> calculate and report vertical gradient as the information derived is fairly redundant and does <br /> not appear to be needed for proper management of the plume of impacted groundwater. If <br /> GZA can demonstrate that significant changes in the vertical gradient are likely to occur and <br /> that the information is required to make specific adjustments in managing the groundwater <br /> contaminant plume, then EHD will reconsider this recommendation. <br /> The EHD approves continuation of: <br /> • Bi-monthly AS/SVE system operation and monitoring activities of the existing <br /> system; <br /> • Monthly groundwater monitoring of selected wells to assess the performance and <br /> effectiveness of the existing AS/SVE system; <br /> • Quarterly groundwater monitoring and sampling that includes an annual event and <br /> three quarterly remedial performance groundwater monitoring events; and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.