Laserfiche WebLink
Geological reckntcs Inc. • • Page 2 <br /> Geoprobe Investigation <br /> Project No. 425.2 <br /> September l8,2008 <br /> GTI installed five new water-table monitoring wells and one intermediate depth, discretely <br /> screened, monitoring well. In mid 1998, GTI installed two additional intermediate depths, <br /> discretely screened, monitoring wells and one deep discretely screened, monitoring well. <br /> Quarterly groundwater monitoring reports have been submitted throughout the project. <br /> In late July 2001, GTI and Del Tech performed a limited soil excavation at the site and <br /> removed approximately 500 cubic yards of contaminated soil. Analytical data show that <br /> approximately 4,900 pounds of TPH-G were removed from the site. At the end of October <br /> 2001, the stockpiled soil was transported and disposed of at Forward Landfill. GTI submitted <br /> a report on the soil excavation activities on January 28, 2002. <br /> In the letter dated June 28, 2004, Nuel C. Henderson, Jr., R.G., San Joaquin County <br /> Environmental Health Department (SJC/EHD) reviewed and accepted the proposed method <br /> of in situ oxidation remedial method in the Feasibility study dated 28 April 2004, and <br /> directed GTI to prepare and submit the work plan for Bench Scale Testing. GTI prepared and <br /> submitted the Work Plan dated August 16, 2004 for Bench Scale Study to Mr. Nuel <br /> Henderson of SJC/EHD and Mr. James Barton of California Regional Water Quality Control <br /> Board — Central Valley Region (CRWQCB-CV). Mr. James Barton on a telephone <br /> conversation(September 22, 2004) with GTI discussed the issue of pre-bench scale testing to <br /> determine if we could proceed directly to the pilot testing and skip the full Bench Scale <br /> Testing. After the telephone conversation with Mr. James Barton, GTI discussed this issue <br /> with Dr. Angus McGrath of SECOR International Incorporated. Dr. Angus McGrath agreed <br /> to write the report based on his other similar studies of chemical oxidation from the <br /> groundwater and soil analysis from the anticipated target zones of chemical oxidation. Mr. <br /> James Barton directed GTI to write the Work Plan Addendum for Pre Bench Scale/Pilot <br /> Testing. GTI prepared and submitted the Plan Addendum — Pre Bench Scale/Pilot Testing <br /> dated September 22, 2004 to SJC/EHD and CRWQCB-CV. Mr. James Barton approved the <br /> work plan in the letter correspondence dated October 4, 2004 with some conditions. The <br /> purpose of this Pre Bench Scale Testing and study was to determine whether a full Bench <br /> Scale Testing is necessary prior to a Pilot Study. <br /> GTI performed bench scale testing/study in the months of December 2004 thru March 2005 <br /> according to the work plan approved in a letter correspondence dated October 4, 2005 by <br /> CRWQCB. GTI prepared and submitted the bench scale testing/study report dated March 10, <br /> 2005 to county and CRWQCB. <br /> However, Mr. James Barton (CRWQCB) in his emails dated February 23 and 24, 2005 gave <br /> the indication to skip the full scale bench scale testing. GTI interprets from these emails that <br /> CRWQCB should not have any objection if GTI moved forward to the pilot testing. GTI <br /> proceeded with ozone sparging and vapor extraction pilot testing. Monitoring during the <br /> pilot test showed that hexavalent chromium was present in the groundwater, so further use of <br /> ozone sparging was abandoned. <br />