Laserfiche WebLink
• • Page 3 <br /> GeologicalTeckxicslnc. <br /> Geoprobe Investigation <br /> Project No. 425.2 <br /> September 18,2008 <br /> GTI per San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department (SJCEHD) directive <br /> submitted a work plan for two sentinel wells installation at the site to protect the domestic <br /> wells from contamination on September 26, 2007. SJCEHD approved the work plan on <br /> January 16, 2008 and the two wells were installed on June 25 and 26, 2008. <br /> Geological Technics Inc. (GTI) submitted the remedial action plan: Air Sparging, Soil Vapor <br /> Extraction and Oxygen Releasing Compound Application, on November 29, 2007 followed <br /> by 3 addenda dated February 5, 25 and March 19, 2008. San Joaquin County Environmental <br /> Health Department (SJCEHD) approved the air sparging and vapor extraction portion of the <br /> remedial action plan subject to positive results from a limited 2-week pilot test in their <br /> correspondence dated April 30, 2008. The limited 2-week pilot test is outlined in the <br /> addendum prepared by GTI dated August 13, 2008. However, the ORC injection design and <br /> application at the site per SJCEHD directive requires further site investigation to clarify the <br /> horizontal and vertical extent of the plume toward northern portion of the site (under Durham <br /> Ferry Road). <br /> The present work plan details the geo-probe investigation to better understand the vertical <br /> and horizontal extent of the plume on the north side of the site. <br /> 1.3 Site Geology and Hydrogeology <br /> The following section discusses the geology and hydrogeology as documented during this <br /> investigation based on the interpretations of the field geologists: <br /> • Figure 4A shows the cross-sections of the site geology. <br /> • The cross sections indicate that the site geology consists of thin layers/lenses of different <br /> soil types. <br /> • Most of the contamination plume exists in the shallow well zone (screen intervals 5 feet <br /> to 22 feet bgs). <br /> • The site geology is heterogeneous for this site. There is different depth versus soil type <br /> divisions for every cross-section. However, typically the site geology appears as sand or <br /> silty-sand units that are sandwiched between finer-grained clay units. This may be the <br /> reason that contamination has not moved to the deep zones. <br /> • Depths to groundwater are typically around 12 feet bgs. <br /> • Groundwater direction has ranged from northeast to northwest with a greater trend to the <br /> east in the shallow zone (Zone A), and to the northwest in the deeper zone (Zone B) in the <br /> last five quarterly monitoring events. <br /> • The average gradient is 0.0013 ft/ft in Zone A and 0.0032 in Zone B. <br /> • Vertical gradient between shallow and deep well pairs have been predominantly positive <br /> in the quarterly monitoring events. <br /> • Soil samples (in the bench scale sampling) have been analyzed for geotechnical data that <br /> are summarized in the following table: <br />