Laserfiche WebLink
'f <br /> GeoCogtcaf?echnus Inc Page 5 <br />' Groundwater Monitoring Report <br /> Protect No 425 2 <br /> • April 23,2001 <br /> • Oxidation-Reduction Potential (ORP) was measured (Table 6) and the results suggest <br /> that several of the wells are in the core of the contamination plume or are immediately <br /> down gradient of the plume The negative ORP values indicate that the wells are within <br /> the halo of reaction depleted water caused by biodegradation of the contaminants MWs <br /> -2, -5, -102, -105 - - <br /> 3.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> The following conclusions have been drawn regarding the status of the groundwater at this <br /> site and recommendations for future work <br /> Conclusions <br />' 1 The water table groundwater gradient historically flowed in a northern direction at about <br /> 0 002 ft/ft prior to May 1998 However, since that time, the gradient has shifted towards <br /> the northeast The reason for the anomalous southeasterly direction is not known at this <br /> time <br /> 2 The intermediate depth groundwater flows more easterly than the water table, which is <br /> consistent with previous monitoring events The cause for this shift is not known at this <br /> time <br /> 3 Vertical groundwater gradients have been found to be flowing upward during winter and <br /> early spring and downward during late spring and summer This may be due to the <br /> annual cycle of groundwater pumping needs of the community A comparison of <br /> monitoring events conducted in April 1999 & March 2000 reveal positive gradients <br /> The March 2001 event gradient was also positive <br /> 4 The dominance of upward vertical flow of groundwater may be the primary reason the <br /> containinants has not impacted the drinking water aquifer During heavy pumping, the <br /> contaminants would be moved into deeper portions of the aquifer and a slower rate then <br /> they would be moved back to a shallower depth in low pumping periods of the year <br /> 5 The shallow water table groundwater plume is laterally defined except to the west <br />' 6 Petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations in the groundwater at the site fluctuate with each <br /> monitoring event <br /> 7 The deeper groundwater plume is defined vertically since MW-102 and MW-202 <br /> remain non-detect for contaminants <br /> 8 Two domestic wells associated with this site remain non-detect A third domestic well <br /> detected trace amounts of toluene and xylene contamination for one event in Sept 2000, <br /> which was retested and found to be non-detect The detection is determined to be an <br /> anomaly possibly caused by cross contamination <br />