Laserfiche WebLink
C L E A R W"A" T ER <br /> rc ROLP [ \ ( <br /> E-­mental Services <br /> rsummarized on Table 2, and shown graphically on Figure 4 Copies of the laboratory report and chain- <br /> of-custody form are attached <br /> rDistribution of Residual Contaminants in Groundwater <br /> Dissolved-phase contamination in groundwater samples continued to be detected only in very low <br /> r levels this monitoring event All wells except MW-1, MW-2, and MW-6 were completely non-detect <br /> for all contaminants Maximum contaminant levels found in these three wells were TPHg 550 µg/L <br /> (MW-1), Benzene 2 6 tig/L, and MTBE 78 pg/L (MW-2) <br /> The samples collected from both sparge wells, screened deeper than the other monitoring wells, were <br /> P P g P g <br /> r also free of detectable contaminant concentrations This is noteworthy in that the results effectively <br /> delineate the vertical extent of residual dissolved-phase contamination on-site Additionally, the <br /> domestic well continues to remain free of gasoline contaminants <br /> The Fuel Oxygenate MTBE was the only oxygenate detected in groundwater samples MTBE was <br /> detected in MW-1 (6 3 lig/I ) and MW-2 (78 pg/I) No other Fuel Oxygenates (TBA, ETBE, DIPE, TAME) <br /> rnor Lead Scavengers (1,2-DCA, EDB) were detected in any groundwater sample-, collected <br /> Recent and cumulative groundwater sample aralytical data are summarized on Table 3, and is shown <br /> on graphically on Figure 5 Copies of the laboratory report and chain-of-custody form are attached <br />�Q Discussion <br /> I� Confirmation soil sampling was conducted to compare pre-remediation hydrocarbon contammarion <br /> levels, both in soil and groundwater, to those levels following the successful operation of the SVE/AS <br /> system Soil borings were advanced in locations along a cross section through the area estimated to be <br /> the extent of pre-remediation groundwater contamination A comparison of pre- to post-remediation <br /> levels of soil contamination at various depths across the site is sheKn on Table 4 <br /> Based on the results of the confirmation soil samples, it appear-, that the last of The residual soil <br /> contamination exists at the bottom of .he former south underground storage tank (Figure 4) The 10 <br /> foot depth level in CB1 corresponds io this location. At this location, pre-remediation levels of gasoline <br /> in soil were X10,000 mg/kg (Table 4) The results from the -,amples rn CB1 indicate a post-remediation <br /> level of 230 mg/kg at this 10 foot depth level At the -;,iine depth at the base of the former north <br /> underground storage tank pit, pre-remediation levels ref gasoline in soil were also X10,000 mg/kg <br /> Results from the sample at 10 feet bgs to CB2 indicate a post-remediation level of gasoline in soil of <1 <br /> mg/kg <br /> rIn Clearwater's Problera Assesswent Report Feasivilttif Smdy, and Rentediai Action Plan, dated <br /> • February 21, 1996, the total ma-,s of gasoline in the vados- zon. pi for to remediation waS estimated to be <br /> 5,050 lbs , or 842 gallon-, of gaEoline U�[ng the sanic formula as Stated .i theft report, the post- <br /> remediation remaining coracim.rant mass c in M,i estimate'. <br /> ZB107C Conf Borings/GWVR 1Q00 S March 27, 2000 <br />