Laserfiche WebLink
VIOLATION k3 <br /> 602 CFR 112 7(a)(2)Plan failed to discuss equivalent environmental protection, if applicable. <br /> The Spill Prevention,Control,and Countermeasure(SPCC)failed to discuss alternative environmental protection <br /> requirements. The SPCC plan makes a claim that the plan along with its implementation by the facility provides <br /> conformance with the requirements under 40 CFR 112. It stales that the plan does not deviate from the <br /> requirements of under CFR I I2.7(g), (h)(2),(h)(3)and(i)and 40 CFR 112.8.The plan was found to deviate from <br /> section 112.8(c)(6).The SPCC plan does not call for formal inspections to be conducted on the facility tanks and <br /> does not cite an industry standard that would allow this. If the SPCC Plan does not conform to the applicable <br /> requirements,the reasons for nonconformance must be stated and the alternate methods to achieve equivalent <br /> environmental protection must be described in detail in the Plan. Immediately amend the SPCC Plan to include a <br /> discussion of equivalent environmental protection. <br /> NotePer US EPA guidance,if an owner or operator deviates from applicable industry standards to develop an <br /> integrity testing program,then a PE must certify an environmentally equivalent alternative in the SPCC Plan.The <br /> Plan must provide the reason for the deviation,describe the allemative approach,and explain how it achieves <br /> environmental protection equivalent to the applicable industry standard. <br /> This is a Class II violation. <br /> Response: Consulting engineers at ATC are working with our staff to address the noted issues. The SPCC Plan will be <br /> amended. <br /> VIOLATION#4 <br /> 710 CFR 112 8(c)(6)Plan failed to adequately discuss procedures to test or Inspect each container for integrity_ <br /> The SPCC plan did not take into account the s e_configuration,or design of the tank.The SPCC plan does not <br /> reference an industry standard for inspections. Each aboveground container shall be tested and inspected for <br /> integrity on a regular schedule and whenever repairs are made. The qualifications of personnel performing tests <br /> and inspections,frequency and type of testing and inspections that take into account container sve,configuration, <br /> and design shall be deteominel in accordance with industry standards_ F amples of these integrity tests indutle, <br /> but are not limited to visual inspection,hydrostatic testing,radiographic testing,ultrasonic testing,acoustic <br /> emissions testing,or other systems of nondestructive testing. Comparison records and other records of <br /> inspections and tests must be maintained on site. Immediately conduct the necessary testing and submit a copy of <br /> the test results to the EHD,or provide equivalence as allowed by CFR 112 7(a)(2). <br /> This is a Class II violation. <br /> Response:The SPCC Plan will be amended to address the noted issues, inspections will be conducted and documented <br /> as required and consistent with the identified standards. <br />