Laserfiche WebLink
A%W N#014 <br /> Letter Of 9-13-91 <br /> 1. The last two quarterly reports have indicated a TPHg of <.50 ppb due to a clerical <br /> error. The original lab report showing 58 ppb is correct. <br /> 2. All future reports and proposals will include a letter of acknowledgment. <br /> 3. We believe that we have identified the lateral and vertical extents of contamination. I think <br /> that the results of BH-1 are being reviewed with the results from MW 9, 10, 11. Again, <br /> BH-1 is related to another tank 600' away. <br /> 4. The site was determined clean in the Phase I1 Investigation Report dated 7-7-90, except for <br /> 1 ppb of benzene in Monitor Well 11. Therefore, a Problem Assessment Report was not <br /> considered necessary. <br /> 5. The disposal of well water will be handled as discussed in the response to the letter of <br /> 10-10-90, part 4. <br /> 6. Please find the boring location and boring log in this package. BH-1 was installed on 3-27- <br /> 90 with Greg Lyon present and backfilled with concrete the same day. <br /> 1. We believe that Monitor Wells 9, 10, 11 are properly located at or near the boundary of <br /> any possible contamination. The monitor wells are showing benzene as less than .5 ppb <br /> to 1.7 ppb. Even though the gradient changes direction from northeast to southeast, we <br /> are still able to monitor any changes in benzene levels. Also, Monitor Well 12 was installed <br /> in the same direction as Monitor Well S. On 6-7-91 there was no BTX found in Monitor <br /> Well 12. <br /> 2. Again, the TPHd that you refer to is related to BH-1, which is related to another tank 600' <br /> away. <br /> In regards to future sampling events: <br /> 1. Elder Engineering will be using a reel to retrieve the bailer from the wells. <br /> 2. Elder Engineering will confirm all sampling dates 48 hours in advance with Steve Schneider <br /> by phone and fax. <br /> 3. After five sampling events, Monitor Wells 9, 10, 11 are clean except for a trace of benzene <br /> in Monitor Well 9 & 11. However, even for this well 3 out of the five tests showed <br /> benzene to be below an action level. Therefore, we believe that closure of Monitor Wells <br /> 9, 10, 11 are in order if the next sampling event shows benzene below an action level. <br />