Laserfiche WebLink
t yr~!,;z}W'F ,,,.,.�jj'~r '" .::r n; .,.y,�,�• r �.ti 7' b .2d rt _r„;. �^"i1,'y--,!""` 7 - :�.i�'s�.-<';u �` "Sfi <br /> �y <br /> ,.311cxi�+_�o- <br /> 75'r"k"Y"'�•y,yrF,�fr S;=;.i;%iC'N�'kr r,S^•�' e },�h'k..-; ^ ,{�C +W” r4° f��'-. r:.. c ?f . s� i;� r r,c <br /> d �.o.��y„ _, �..�..,:�.��xv��.r,� �' 1Qi#":.dpi q� 'yy �'�:+'��.f' Y - J -•'�, �i��Y l� r n;� sro� !d�'�� r <br /> � e3-- 4r �, .•,:ur > Sf k ��7JY Ld le!-� r .S ),*.ra n3 ' '6F_T r r T`n xr� 'L{ 4 a,Y � r �t _ <br /> i J <br /> B:\CYLOPURG.DOC <br /> condensate tank to help <br /> the charcoal. <br /> Thincrease the reduction BYpa8singof <br /> The €ollvwinq occtrred: <br /> hydrocarbons to <br /> vacuum the orifice <br /> at the Plate manifold decreased <br /> as follows intheincreased the vacuum the <br /> at the well- <br /> total <br /> Orifice total 68 bYAass orifice %incr��ase <br /> msal /decrease <br /> mw5 38 58 <br /> ex 52 46 -14,7 <br /> 1 51 53 '+•17.4 <br /> P <br /> P51 48 +1.9 <br /> 51 55 •g <br /> 52 -x-7.3 <br /> 2. After the X1.9 <br /> cor;densahe tank was placed at <br /> [2 a 'steady stream the influent of the <br /> produced gallons ofc <br /> i.n 2.5 hrs or condensate was <br /> 3• No reduction •8 gal <br /> stream at then hydrocarbons were <br /> sa,� l effluent °ccuring in <br /> P e, condensate tank set sato5poped to the vapor <br /> influent r <br /> 4• Condesate <br /> produced <br /> of hydrocarbons froj' Y pressure <br /> 'J greater ydrocarbons b" .increased <br /> 3 tim <br /> in concentration 18°2%. and is ixs <br /> to Obtain sample). than MW1 (MW5 water was es <br /> 5• A flow to iota � <br /> rate of 72 c€m can be <br /> Al and P3 all wide o achieved with <br /> achieved from P1 and p3Peri, bet limited <br /> flow' w rig ��, <br /> be <br /> 5• Partially opening MW1 and 2fW5 <br /> k wide open influences influen and leavin I <br /> the entire g E%, P1 arld P3 1 <br /> 7• The follo area of remediation. { <br /> Willy .vacuum_- i <br /> wells in water• MSd2�C °ccur.ing at the <br /> mm of <br /> Table 2 10, 11W3 3 Wy perimeter <br /> shows 8 and MWG i• <br /> concentrations calculations '• <br /> to condense n, the Vapor using dela points <br /> Bathe V P stream to prediction pressures <br /> the <br /> With a needed <br /> estimated pvaporream concentration_ of 23 t <br /> ! f <br /> 19 atmflspheres pressure of 82 @ pop bpm as aged gasoline <br /> S1 with is needed or 144157 (aged gasoline) a with a <br /> low cancpntrgtions `i Bg• This indicatesure °f <br /> the removal of he <br /> as gas <br /> CYcZo Pure that <br /> diesel removal (cam o g$soline g is not efficient .3 <br /> P ands with lower dew but maybe beneficial for <br /> 4 <br /> The CYclo Purge points). ; <br /> 'i"ith some g has shown to be successfulr <br /> through hydrocarbons as dissolved in Z <br /> 9 the condensate in the water with <br /> the water <br /> nsate tank f4.5 mg/L hydrocarbons), pressure t. <br /> } <br /> ;J <br /> 1 . <br /> 4 <br /> �1 <br /> rr- <br />